Search results

DDR4 at 2166MT/s gets 54Gb/s easily in real life (had to measure that at work last week) and cfe 4.0 type B support 32gbit/s before overhead, so buffer clearing should be quite fast as well. I suspect the digic has the sensor DMA its data straight to RAM, so the sensor speed is likely the...

I bought an R7 through Panamoz last month and that was a great experience. No hidden fees and the HK->NL transit took about a week, with working tracking all the way.

It is! The amount of sugar varies, but it will be sweet regardless :)

The R7 has a feature where it will keep the sensor level when you have the camera at an angle. It has a few, IMO, stupid restrictions like forcing fully mechanical shutter, but it works quite well to combat my pretty consistent 1 degree slant :) But the R6II and R3 lack that feature, which makes...

@Richard CR Canon did show 2 different VR lenses mounted to R7 bodies at CES 2024, one looked like a non-L version of the existing dual fisheye, the other like an regular lens with 2 tiny lenses inside. A screencap from Hugh Hou's video:

Don't forget about Sony moving the camera department to a different business unit every year to make year-over-year tracking impossible!

10-15 years ago it was ‘common knowledge’ in the interwebs that the bottleneck was growing the fluorite crystals. I don’t know if that was actually the case, but people liked to say it :) Anyway, I hope the gap between announcement and shipping is ‘days’, not ‘weeks’ or ‘months’ and that the...

But the 100D had better specs than other bodies, it ticked all the boxes for me when I wanted something smaller than my 7D, but with faster AF than my M. The 100D was a lot of camera for its size and price. And it had a touchscreen :)

Which, in some way, is good news for Canon: they are selling every copy of those lenses that gets produced.

AFAICT only the R7 has IBIS when it comes to Canon RF bodies with APS-C sensors.

I really hope that the rumoured Q2 announcements actually ship in Q2 as well, but that will be very tight with the predicted end-of-May announcement date. That’s not even considering the ‘usual’ supply chain issues Canon has been showing where the first batch is relatively small and the big...

I think I detect some sarcasm :) The Sigma 30mm is a full centimeter wider (72mm) than the EF-M one (61mm), but roughly the same length. So that's a good 'replacement' for EF-M people going to RF. The Sigma 23mm however, is a lot longer than the EF-M 22mm, which puts it, for me, in a very...

I really hope that gets fixed in future bodies!

Does the R50 get power over USB in UVC mode? My R8 doesn’t :( When using a capture card plus USB it will get power, and even charge the battery! But that’s a lot more cabling and hassle.

If only I had an extra $26k lying around! Their cameras would be great for high speed macro work (dragonflies!) combined with the 180L.

The original source said €2000 according to @ordinaryfilmmaker, hopefully that includes tax already.

Since the RF50 f/1.8 is already €230, I wouldn't have expected the f/1.4 version to be below €1000, especially considering the Sony f/1.4 GM is €1700. I would have guessed €1300.

I've like to have open-gate for extra stabilization headroom in post, I'm not steady handed and macro distances make that even worse.

I'm too cynical to read "supports focus breathing correction" into that. The RF24-105 f/4L also has everything mentioned in the above screenshot, but lacks focus breathing correction.

I do find the prospect of having both the EF-M 56mm f/1.4 and the RF(-S) 56mm f/1.4 a bit extra ;)