I sure hope so, but it doesn't look like it...
neuroanatomist said:Personally, I'm hoping for a 35mm f/1.4L II...
Same here. I would sell my Canon 28 1.8 and by the new 35L. 35mm will work better for me and i'm ready to upgrade.neuroanatomist said:Personally, I'm hoping for a 35mm f/1.4L II...
ablearcher said:Same here. I would sell my Canon 28 1.8 and by the new 35L. 35mm will work better for me and i'm ready to upgrade.neuroanatomist said:Personally, I'm hoping for a 35mm f/1.4L II...
ageha said:How is the AF of the EF 35mm f/2.0? Is it as slow as the 50mm f/1.8 mkII? What about the EF 28mm f/1.8 USM, is it considered to be a fast and sharp lens?
Artisttt said:What is the point to make new EF-S lens??? Would be much better to renew EF 35mm f/2
epsiloneri said:Currently, the only EF-S prime is the EF-S 60/2.8 macro. I'm sure high-quality EF-S primes in a small form factor would find its audience. Most dSLRs are not FF anyway.
TBenson said:But the existing 35mm f2 is already small/cheap/light so I don't see why a new lens at that focal length would be EF-S.