Found at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=649&v=Za2AeCujDZk
Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=649&v=Za2AeCujDZk
Enjoy!
unfocused said:Please summarize, as I can’t bear to watch that goofball.
50 or 75 isn't exactly a rumor...snoke said:unfocused said:Please summarize, as I can’t bear to watch that goofball.
5Ds Mark II
$4,499
50 or 75 MP
5D Mark IV body
1080p
Somewhat plausible, but focusing system may very will be an improvent of 7DII's with more AF points than 61.snoke said:7D Mark III
$2,299
7D Mark II body
24 MP, no AA
12 FPS, 1DX II focus system
4K full-width
AF (and video?) not plausible. Somewhere around 45 af points would be more believable...snoke said:90D
...
7D Mark II focus system
Yes sure, they will use an existing namesnoke said:M3
...
unfocused said:Please summarize, as I can’t bear to watch that goofball.
arthurbikemad said:unfocused said:Please summarize, as I can’t bear to watch that goofball.
Agree. 8)
snoke said:unfocused said:Please summarize, as I can’t bear to watch that goofball.
5Ds Mark II
7D Mark III
90D
M3 [FF mirrorless]1
unfocused said:By the way, Snoke, I appreciate your succinct, to-the-point comments. I know that your English skills aren't super strong, but a lot of times, the rest of us could learn something from your ability to convey ideas in a few, clear words.
reef58 said:I don't know why he gets so much hate. He said right upfront his predictions would be wrong and even gave examples of how he was wrong last year. I think people hear what they want to hear with people they dislike. Him and Chelsea inspire me in a different way than say Ben Horn or Ted Forbes, but I enjoy their content. I guess i am in the minority.
ahsanford said:reef58 said:I don't know why he gets so much hate. He said right upfront his predictions would be wrong and even gave examples of how he was wrong last year. I think people hear what they want to hear with people they dislike. Him and Chelsea inspire me in a different way than say Ben Horn or Ted Forbes, but I enjoy their content. I guess i am in the minority.
That's fine, and I'm glad you enjoy his content, but he should stick his strengths -- stuff that inspires or shares opinion.
But this forum has identified countless "Ugh, no that's not how it works at all, Tony" sort of moments where he is spreading information that is not exactly based in fact. And I'm being kind in saying that. Others here will not pull punches in response to some of the things he's said.
- A
reef58 said:Are people not allowed to be wrong? I am wrong about something everyday.
ahsanford said:reef58 said:Are people not allowed to be wrong? I am wrong about something everyday.
But it's delivered with the veneer of 'rightness' and 'you can trust me', etc. that makes his thing a bit professorial, and that sort of role should be strictly factual, IMHO.
Again, no ill will towards what does. It's just not for me.
- A
reef58 said:Are people not allowed to be wrong? I am wrong about something everyday.
neuroanatomist said:reef58 said:Are people not allowed to be wrong? I am wrong about something everyday.
Sure they are. When their errors are pointed out, they're also allowed to continue to defend their mistakes, even at the expense of their reputation. Personally, I choose to acknowledge my errors and thank those who correct me. Tony prefers a different approach.
arthurbikemad said:unfocused said:Please summarize, as I can’t bear to watch that goofball.
Agree. 8)