Who said Canon cameras suck?!?

Status
Not open for further replies.
K-amps said:
Chill Dtaylor.... you can't bully people into agreeing with you...

Bullying? ::) I don't think I'm the one who needs to chill.

everyone has their own sense of reality that governs their perceptions and opinions.

Silly me...I thought we lived in a common, measurable reality.

I saw the noise... He saw the noise....

Allow me to quote jrista:
That "uniform" nature? Thats called photon shot noise. It's a physical effect caused by the NATURAL random distribution of light that follows Poisson distribution (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_noise#Poisson_noise_and_characterizing_small_occurrences). FYI...every single camera on earth experiences photon shot noise, regardless of who makes it or how good it may be.

There was no noise. There was nothing that could be interpreted as noise until 100% pixel peeping, at which point you see the natural random distribution of light. And even that is difficult to make out. If that bothers you...if you want plastic skies while pixel peeping at 100%...it is stupid simple to make the sky plastic in PS.

But I hope I'm not being a bully in pointing that out 8)
 
Upvote 0
ankorwatt said:
Razor2012 said:
Neuro you know you're popular when people join just to comment on your posts. ;)

He is not popular,mybe popular among ignorant people . Neuro writes so many inaccuracies and he is not listening to other people with knowledge.

You do realize of course that by this statement youare saying the majority of people on this forum are ignorant, because neuro is highly respected around here. Maybe you'd be happier on a different forum where you don't have to tolerate all us ignoramuses.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.