Next year's APS-C vs. this year's FF
- Thread starter aroo
- Start date
- Status
It would not make sense for them to release a APS-C camera that is equal to or better than the current FF sensors... but if they did, it would be in the price range of the 1DX.
If they did have the tech to do it right now, why would they? there is not enough market pressure for them to discard possible profits and. they are still making money on the current tech... it is dumb for them to not ride the gravy train!
Just my 2 pence!
If they did have the tech to do it right now, why would they? there is not enough market pressure for them to discard possible profits and. they are still making money on the current tech... it is dumb for them to not ride the gravy train!
Just my 2 pence!
Upvote
0
J
jukka
Guest
aroo said:
pattern noise and banding, you must cope with that as long Canon are not dealing with theirs read out problems.
Nikon D4, D3s etc can handle it and it with out any banding ,and it is a Nikon / Renesas solution and close to 1dx.5dmk3 etc with the read out structure and not a Sony solution as in D800, d7000 1dx d600 with column wise ADC at the sensor edge
We are some people who think Canon is sloppy regarding the read out signal and they can introduce a better solution to even out banding.
Upvote
0
Mt Spokane Photography said:
We don't know if they "can" price lower than the competition. We do know that they "don't."
Upvote
0
J
jukka
Guest
They can not price the sensors lower than for example Sony if they will have the same tech.
Even today the sensors department with the old tech have a high internal price for a 24x36mm sensor.
And Canon does not make the whole assembly in-house, it means that the sensor waffers are packed dust free and transported to a collaborative partner from one clean room to another, which is time consuming and expensive.
Even today the sensors department with the old tech have a high internal price for a 24x36mm sensor.
And Canon does not make the whole assembly in-house, it means that the sensor waffers are packed dust free and transported to a collaborative partner from one clean room to another, which is time consuming and expensive.
Upvote
0
interesting topic.
I doubt APS-C can, at this stage, equal or better FF sensors. But, I bet they can come close. If they can come close then I could see the direction of the 7d2 being the smaller kid brother to the 1dx. I could see a body like that fitting in the range between the 6d and the 5d3. Canon has no reason to make an aps-c in the price range of a 1dx --- then it would be too much direct competion for 2 sports bodies.
If there is another body in the 1dx range my guess is it will be the big MP body, which would be in a totally different league than the 1dx. Incredible res, much improved DR and low ISO performance, and far lower fps. The 1dx would still be valid, only difference to canon is that only those that need what a 1dx would do would buy it, those printing giant landscape prints nad doing high level studio work can buy the big MP monster.
adhocphotographer said:
I doubt APS-C can, at this stage, equal or better FF sensors. But, I bet they can come close. If they can come close then I could see the direction of the 7d2 being the smaller kid brother to the 1dx. I could see a body like that fitting in the range between the 6d and the 5d3. Canon has no reason to make an aps-c in the price range of a 1dx --- then it would be too much direct competion for 2 sports bodies.
If there is another body in the 1dx range my guess is it will be the big MP body, which would be in a totally different league than the 1dx. Incredible res, much improved DR and low ISO performance, and far lower fps. The 1dx would still be valid, only difference to canon is that only those that need what a 1dx would do would buy it, those printing giant landscape prints nad doing high level studio work can buy the big MP monster.
Upvote
0
- Status
Similar threads
