Sycotek said:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update 27/07:
OK so speaking with Canon We have isolated it down to an AF function/modification. It doesn't seem to be a custom function change.
I tend to use case 1 and case 4 and modify case 4 (all sliders moved to the very left) - now I can't seem to figure out what combination of changes make the AF balls up. I had everything set as I like it last night but the second i changed over rotation to computer only (as i tend to shoot portrait mode) the af started to play up. Undoing the rotation change did not fix the issue. Had to reset to a working backup.
If I leave the af setting as stock default everything works properly.
And as it has always been this only shows up in low light Servo.
If anyone is interested I can load a broken config they can play around with and see if they can work it out.
It's a little frustrating as I don't know what I am changing that's causing the AF to bug out. As proved to me when I was shooting with canon in and underground car park the 1DX could lock onto a black car moving at 20+ km/hr in next to no light and get a ridiculously sharp image.
Canon is working on it, as am I - keep keep this updated.
Sycotek said:Hi justaphotographer,
I haven't had any issues using the reset config I got from canon - I have now reconfigured my own without touching the af settings and it worked fine last-night at another runway tracking black subjects at 1/250 f4 iso 10K <- this was not fun...)
I believe like you its a contrast issue. But the default configuration doesn't exhibit the same issues that I had with my tweaked config.
eg. single 60w equivalent cfl room light trying to track my gf face - the broken config wont lock on anything. The reset config locks on Her eye brows and eyes, under her nose and lips as if it was nothing.
The test with canon was well below -2ev (i could not see the other reps eyes yet the camera locked on as if it was nothing and focussed accurately) broken config just hunted - canon rep couldn't believe it.
---
As annoying as it is if you haven't tried it - i would recommend making a backup of your current config and send it to me, then testing out the config i got from canon - i'll pass your broken one to canon so they have a second point of reference.
I will also test out your finding tomorrow and get back you if i can replicate it![]()
Sycotek said:Hi justaphotographer,
I haven't had any issues using the reset config I got from canon - I have now reconfigured my own without touching the af settings and it worked fine last-night at another runway tracking black subjects at 1/250 f4 iso 10K <- this was not fun...)
I believe like you its a contrast issue. But the default configuration doesn't exhibit the same issues that I had with my tweaked config.
eg. single 60w equivalent cfl room light trying to track my gf face - the broken config wont lock on anything. The reset config locks on Her eye brows and eyes, under her nose and lips as if it was nothing.
The test with canon was well below -2ev (i could not see the other reps eyes yet the camera locked on as if it was nothing and focussed accurately) broken config just hunted - canon rep couldn't believe it.
---
As annoying as it is if you haven't tried it - i would recommend making a backup of your current config and send it to me, then testing out the config i got from canon - i'll pass your broken one to canon so they have a second point of reference.
I will also test out your finding tomorrow and get back you if i can replicate it![]()
Sycotek said:Hi Mate,
Just tested your theory out - in my configuration where i know the camera will fail if i used the bugged out config - my fixed version works regardless of being on L or H.
Is it possible to upload an image regarding the scene/target that you are testing on? And please add what lenses you are using and/or have available to use so we can test with similar gear if possible
-Alex
justaphotographer said:Hi Alex,
Hmmm this is very strange indeed. I loaded your config file and AI-SERVO was great! Then the only single thing I changed was to go from L to H and as soon as I did that AI-SERVO was horrible again. I then changed back to L and once again it was near perfect. I kept going back and forth and it was reproducible 100% of the time. Yes let me give you more detail about my gear (don't have time just yet for uploading pictures though)
I tested this on multiple lenses. 50 1.2, 50 1.4, and 24 1.4 II. I have yet to try my other lenses. All behaved exactly the same in terms of how responsive the AI-SERVO was.
This might suggest something else is going on. Although I still don't think it's hardware because clearly when I switch to L the AI-SERVO works great and when I switch back to H the AI-SERVO is bad again. I am not sure why you are not seeing that or why I am not see what you are getting. Hmmmm
Sycotek said:Hi Mate,
Just tested your theory out - in my configuration where i know the camera will fail if i used the bugged out config - my fixed version works regardless of being on L or H.
Is it possible to upload an image regarding the scene/target that you are testing on? And please add what lenses you are using and/or have available to use so we can test with similar gear if possible
-Alex
neuroanatomist said:A troubleshooting suggestion. H and L frame rates are customizable (C.Fn3 menu). What happens if you set H to 3 fps or L to 11 fps? Can you ID a frame rate threshold for the problem?
neuroanatomist said:A troubleshooting suggestion. H and L frame rates are customizable (C.Fn3 menu). What happens if you set H to 3 fps or L to 11 fps? Can you ID a frame rate threshold for the problem?
neuroanatomist said:With H at 12, L can be 11. Does the issue occur on L = 11 fps?
justaphotographer said:Yes with L at 11 the problem does occur. The problem only disappears when either H or L is at 10 fps or below.
neuroanatomist said:With H at 12, L can be 11. Does the issue occur on L = 11 fps?