I am torn between the 70-200ii and 100-400ii specifically as they apply to landscapes. I will be shooting mostly handheld @ f5.6 or f8 with some f4 and f11. Currently will be paired with a 6D but will likely upgrade to a 5DSR with in a year. I have a good idea of the pros/cons for these lenses as they apply to other genres of photography but landscape performance is probably the most important to me.
As I see it the biggest difference is the 70mm on the 70-200ii. As a pixelpeeper, is there any noticeable difference in IQ for the shared focal lengths? How does the IQ of the 70-200ii+1.4xiii compare to 300mm on the 100-400? With the 100-400 I think I would still need a 24-70/24-105 in my kit whereas I could pair the 70-200 with a UWA zoom but more likely a 24 prime. Any input is appreciated!
As I see it the biggest difference is the 70mm on the 70-200ii. As a pixelpeeper, is there any noticeable difference in IQ for the shared focal lengths? How does the IQ of the 70-200ii+1.4xiii compare to 300mm on the 100-400? With the 100-400 I think I would still need a 24-70/24-105 in my kit whereas I could pair the 70-200 with a UWA zoom but more likely a 24 prime. Any input is appreciated!