Sent in my 7D Mark II for service connected to the AF early two weekends ago. This may mark my third weekend without it.
Upvote
0
takesome1 said:Lee Jay said:Is that strange or what?
It will be strange that after Canon identified it as a lens problem you still think it is a body problem.
Send the lens to Canon.
Lee Jay said:takesome1 said:Lee Jay said:Is that strange or what?
It will be strange that after Canon identified it as a lens problem you still think it is a body problem.
Send the lens to Canon.
I want to do some more testing first (IS on/off, and a third lens - the 24-105). They only told me this yesterday and today I'm sick, so I'm not losing any time yet.
Man, when this camera nails focus on a good lens (which is basically always except for the condition I described above), it's sharp and very low in noise. I'm incredibly pleased with this thing except for this one problem and some stupid software decisions I hope they'll eventually fix.
takesome1 said:Lee Jay said:takesome1 said:Lee Jay said:Is that strange or what?
It will be strange that after Canon identified it as a lens problem you still think it is a body problem.
Send the lens to Canon.
I want to do some more testing first (IS on/off, and a third lens - the 24-105). They only told me this yesterday and today I'm sick, so I'm not losing any time yet.
Man, when this camera nails focus on a good lens (which is basically always except for the condition I described above), it's sharp and very low in noise. I'm incredibly pleased with this thing except for this one problem and some stupid software decisions I hope they'll eventually fix.
Is the lens under warrant?
I sent my 7D II in for service, returned it in 7 days.
No problems at all now.
For peace of mind if the lens is under warranty ship them both off.
RodS57 said:I contacted canon Canada about my camera in early March and sent in the requested pictures. None of the shots were in focus but they said nothing was wrong with my camera. In the course of the correspondence they never suggested I should send it in to be checked. Due to possible time frame for repair and upcoming trip I will wait until probably this fall to send it in. Trying to give this camera every chance to prove I am the problem. Not impressed with camera or canon so far.
Rod
Lee Jay said:takesome1 said:Lee Jay said:takesome1 said:Lee Jay said:Is that strange or what?
It will be strange that after Canon identified it as a lens problem you still think it is a body problem.
Send the lens to Canon.
I want to do some more testing first (IS on/off, and a third lens - the 24-105). They only told me this yesterday and today I'm sick, so I'm not losing any time yet.
Man, when this camera nails focus on a good lens (which is basically always except for the condition I described above), it's sharp and very low in noise. I'm incredibly pleased with this thing except for this one problem and some stupid software decisions I hope they'll eventually fix.
Is the lens under warrant?
I sent my 7D II in for service, returned it in 7 days.
No problems at all now.
For peace of mind if the lens is under warranty ship them both off.
Yeah...they're a month old.
ReggieABrown said:Maybe I got extremely lucky with the 7d mark ii I received because mine is track sharp! So sharp in fact I have to reduce the sharpening in post.
Keith_Reeder said:ReggieABrown said:Maybe I got extremely lucky with the 7d mark ii I received because mine is track sharp! So sharp in fact I have to reduce the sharpening in post.
Yep, same here.
Yes, it's expensive, but base on the build and performance, I don't consider it's over-priced.Mt Spokane Photography said:Keith_Reeder said:ReggieABrown said:Maybe I got extremely lucky with the 7d mark ii I received because mine is track sharp! So sharp in fact I have to reduce the sharpening in post.
Yep, same here.
Some definitely have had issues, its hard to gage just how many. I've held off on it simply because I think its over priced.
I use it on both 400mm F5.6L and Tamron 150-600mm. Not much problem with 400mm F5.6L.DigitalEdgePhotography said:Just sold my 7D to purchase the 7D2. It is very soft and inconsistent. I have used it with my 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM, 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM II, 24-70 f/2.8L USM, 24-105 f/4L IS USM and more recently my new Tamron 150-600.... and have had very inconsistent results. My 7D performed better, quite honestly.
I will stick with my 5D2, 5D3 and hope the firmware helps on the 7D2.
JimKarczewski said:Same here, I rarely use my 7DII unless absolutely necessary. People STANDING STILL in AI-Servo are severely out of focus???
This was an example from today, but sometimes it's a person standing on base talking to the coach and I'm not switching to single shot to get a standing still person just to switch back to servo..
And then there are shots in focus in the same series. So nothing moved, but the camera went from in focus to out and then back in again. Frustrating as all hell.
JimKarczewski said:Same here, I rarely use my 7DII unless absolutely necessary. People STANDING STILL in AI-Servo are severely out of focus???
This was an example from today, but sometimes it's a person standing on base talking to the coach and I'm not switching to single shot to get a standing still person just to switch back to servo..
And then there are shots in focus in the same series. So nothing moved, but the camera went from in focus to out and then back in again. Frustrating as all hell.