SecureGSM said:Canon is also twice more expensive : Sigma at A$1,050 (with discount) vs Canon 85 F1.4 IS at over A$2,000
CanonFanBoy said:SecureGSM said:Canon is also twice more expensive : Sigma at A$1,050 (with discount) vs Canon 85 F1.4 IS at over A$2,000
Isn't the Canon $1,599? That's before any future rebates, bundles, and sales. I would take the Canon all day long at that price differential.
Does anyone know whether the Sigma suffers from mirror box clipping like the Canon does?
CanonFanBoy said:Does anyone know whether the Sigma suffers from mirror box clipping like the Canon does?
ahsanford said:CanonFanBoy said:SecureGSM said:Canon is also twice more expensive : Sigma at A$1,050 (with discount) vs Canon 85 F1.4 IS at over A$2,000
Isn't the Canon $1,599? That's before any future rebates, bundles, and sales. I would take the Canon all day long at that price differential.
Does anyone know whether the Sigma suffers from mirror box clipping like the Canon does?
Updated that for you, for emphasis. Not everyone is granted the tasty new product pricing we enjoy in the States.
- A
Viggo said:The difference between the Art and 85 IS here is 423 USD, which I consider a very small difference.
ahsanford said:Viggo said:The difference between the Art and 85 IS here is 423 USD, which I consider a very small difference.
It’s a reasonable price to pay for AF you can rely on for off-center large aperture work.
(The same logic applies for getting the 35L II over the 35 Art)
- A
Viggo said:The difference between the Art and 85 IS here is 423 USD, which I consider a very small difference.
bereninga said:Viggo said:The difference between the Art and 85 IS here is 423 USD, which I consider a very small difference.
A very small difference? It's like 35% more for the 85 IS vs the Art. That's not that small.
Interesting. When comparing Norwegian vs Danish prices, 85A is more expensive (+23.4USD), and the 85L is less expensive (-113.5USD), which makes the difference here climb to 553USD.Viggo said:The difference between the Art and 85 IS here is 423 USD, which I consider a very small difference.
kaihp said:Interesting. When comparing Norwegian vs Danish prices, 85A is more expensive (+23.4USD), and the 85L is less expensive (-113.5USD), which makes the difference here climb to 553USD.Viggo said:The difference between the Art and 85 IS here is 423 USD, which I consider a very small difference.
Still, the price difference for the 85L won't pay for a trip with the boat up to Oslo to buy it.
Ah, that doesn't include a bunk because it's a daytrip right? Copenhagen-Oslo is an overnight trip and the bunks are a ripoff. It's probably cheaper to take Norwegian to Gardermoen than the DFDS boat. Or just drive up there.Viggo said:kaihp said:Interesting. When comparing Norwegian vs Danish prices, 85A is more expensive (+23.4USD), and the 85L is less expensive (-113.5USD), which makes the difference here climb to 553USD.Viggo said:The difference between the Art and 85 IS here is 423 USD, which I consider a very small difference.
Still, the price difference for the 85L won't pay for a trip with the boat up to Oslo to buy it.
From me to Hirtshals with car it’s around 10-15 dollars ;D
kaihp said:Ah, that doesn't include a bunk because it's a daytrip right? Copenhagen-Oslo is an overnight trip and the bunks are a ripoff. It's probably cheaper to take Norwegian to Gardermoen than the DFDS boat. Or just drive up there.Viggo said:kaihp said:Interesting. When comparing Norwegian vs Danish prices, 85A is more expensive (+23.4USD), and the 85L is less expensive (-113.5USD), which makes the difference here climb to 553USD.Viggo said:The difference between the Art and 85 IS here is 423 USD, which I consider a very small difference.
Still, the price difference for the 85L won't pay for a trip with the boat up to Oslo to buy it.
From me to Hirtshals with car it’s around 10-15 dollars ;D