Or a 5DMkV is coming to help us retire our 5DMkIV and 5DsR cameras
OK joking but it's a rumors site after all
OK joking but it's a rumors site after all
Upvote
0
I personally feel the only way Canon is going to give us a high resolution camera is via some sort of sensor shift technology with a more likely (for Canon) lower resolution sensor.75 and well implemented sensor shift high res would be nice - I really liked the S1R when I had one here to test
I appreciate it's not something many want, but I've never stepped up in resolution with a new camera and thought 'that's too much'
You took the words right out of my mouth!Why would Canon want to sell you one camera that does everything when they could sell you two cameras that each do half of everything?
Because 'you' are not a big enough market... ;-)I would like a high megapixel camera with basic video. I want a fantastic stills camera and don't need video so why should I have no choice to have it and pay for it
Check my reply to neuro, and check the reply from GoldwingYou took the words right out of my mouth!
We all have different needs.I've never stepped up in resolution with a new camera and thought 'that's too much'
Oh no!! There will be people who will think that they should be able to use this technology for birding and that Canon would be slow if it could not!I personally feel the only way Canon is going to give us a high resolution camera is via some sort of sensor shift technology with a more likely (for Canon) lower resolution sensor.
Maybe - until sony showed what 61MP can do. there's no sweet spot for providing more pixels on a target and allowing for more reach.Wildlife photographers commonly see 36-45MP as the "sweet spot".
The Canon 32.5MP class heading resolution APS-C sensor waves hello to you. That's is basically the same as 82MP on a full frame sized sensor.I personally feel the only way Canon is going to give us a high resolution camera is via some sort of sensor shift technology with a more likely (for Canon) lower resolution sensor.
Among the roughly 20 Sony wildlife photographers that I personally know, 2 of them use the 50MP a1, and the rest all use the 24MP a9 and a9ii.Maybe - until sony showed what 61MP can do. there's no sweet spot for providing more pixels on a target and allowing for more reach.
45 to 50 Mpx is the minimum for me nowadays. Anything less than that is worse than a 20 Mpx APS-C. More than that, I'll have to see how it works out in practice. I didn't like the files from the 90D.We all have different needs.
Most wedding, events, sports and portrait photographers don't seem to have a need or desire for more than about 20-24MP. Wildlife photographers commonly see 36-45MP as the "sweet spot". Architectural, landscape, and billboard photographers want as much as they can get.
As I commented in an earlier post, I think dual resolution is the way forward, giving users the option to switch between say 80MP and uncropped 20MP simply by toggling a custom button. That way almost everyone gets what they want in a single body.
Because they cannot afford more than that.Why do people want more than 50 mpex on 35mm? Honest question. Thx.
I don’t know how quad pixel AF will work but the 75MP sensor rumour probably have more to do with the technology used in this system rather than the output resolution of the camera.The Canon 32.5MP class heading resolution APS-C sensor waves hello to you. That's is basically the same as 82MP on a full frame sized sensor.
Everything is a compromise and we all have different needs and priorities. Some prioritise high ISO, others prioritise resolution or DR, others prioritise fps. Unfortunately there is no "one size fits all". You say 45-50MP is your current minimum requirement, but a couple of days ago you were extolling the virtues of the 20MP OMI, and saying how good the 20MP Nikon D500 still is, which seems a little contradictory.45 to 50 Mpx is the minimum for me nowadays. Anything less than that is worse than a 20 Mpx APS-C. More than that, I'll have to see how it works out in practice. I didn't like the files from the 90D.
Had some regrets having sold my 5DSR in anticipation of a high MPIX R comming out early after the R5/R6. But Covid severely limited my shooting opportunities, so maybe a good thing after all.Better late than never. Lets hope they nail its like the 5dsR!
R3 body please
75mp is perfect - give us 15+ stops & posibly 4k30fps if I ever needa grab a rare quick video for an architect. Just dont leave it too late or i'll be jumping to the GFX. This will also be a pre-release purchase for me just like the 5dsR that was a good investment for 7-8+ year life cycle
Will be using my DSRLs until this comes out.. keep the TS-E lens - possibly grab a 24 100 RF zoom, then the 100-500 that looks mouth watering..
None of this is true.Focusing accuracy, subject movement and camera-shake all suffer as MP increases