Or we are seeing a LEGO camera for kids
Upvote
0
Maybe Canon took some inspiration fr
Na - a DeLorean. Surely anyone can see it's just a 1DX owned by someone with too much cash and not enough taste ?Maybe Canon took some inspiration from the Tesla cyber truck
Some people care to look at details, some don't. Why do you care that others do?
Sure, but what really got cut off in the image was the Mr Fusion on the hot-shoe. Talk about burst modeNa - a DeLorean. Surely anyone can see it's just a 1DX owned by someone with too much cash and not enough taste ?
I agree with you - it is the 100-400, but when someone suggested it was a different lens I wanted to give them some sort of way of seeing for themselves that it was the 100-400 rather than just saying "you are wrong". Difference in approach to the conversation, but same perspective.
Sure, but what really got cut off in the image was the Mr Fusion on the hot-shoe. Talk about burst mode
I think you might have misunderstood my earlier comments, or are quoting someone else - every post I have made on the lens said it was the 100-400 ii. I referenced the knob on the tripod collar to say 70-300 does not match while the knob on the 100-400 does match. We've been agreeing this whole the whole time, but saying it in different ways. I'm going to leave it here.well sorry, I am only reacting to your stated fact "the lens is the 70-300 L. It definitely is not the 100-400 "
I didnt want anyone else reading that and taking it as fact when I clearly know the post you provided is incorrect.
The two-tone raises the question of why a company that made its premium lenses distinctive with white color shouldn't so something similarly bold to make its camera bodies stand apart? Potentially appealing to me.
If it's bare magnesium it's unexpected to have the logo applied.
If real, I think this is an unfinished prototype. While the distinctive look might be cool on the sidelines, wildlife photographers (myself) would hate this scheme because of reflections. I don't see Canon changing the ergonomics of the 1dx III at this stage of the DSLR lifecycle.
I think you might have misunderstood my earlier comments, or are quoting someone else - every post I have made on the lens said it was the 100-400 ii. I referenced the knob on the tripod collar to say 70-300 does not match while the knob on the 100-400 does match. We've been agreeing this whole the whole time, but saying it in different ways. I'm going to leave it here.
Looks like a 40mm pancake to me.OK at this point who cares what lens it is? We are looking at the camera.
For an extra $799 you'll also be able to download more RAM to increase buffer size.The black will be added later via a firmware update.
Well if the camera is that big there is a 3rd surpise (1: 20mp 2: ugly white/black body) It is a medium format camera hence no 1DxIII !!!
EDIT: Which negates the 2nd surprise because in that super rare (CR0) case it does not correspond to 1DxIII at all! Oh well..
Or the one displayed is just what it seems: A big LEGO camera--- and MAYBE you are in fact CORRECT that it MIGHT be a large sensor (i.e. greater than Full Frame) camera !!!
Anyways, if it IS a large sensor camera, then DO fix the low-light noise issues. I'd rather have 20-to-24 megapixels with large, super-low-light sensitive photosites on my sensors than have a 30 to 75 megapixel monster!
Soooooo, ..... WHat is Happiness?
A Big Burger and BIGGER PHOTOSITES
.