What's actually kinda wild is that DJI sort of figured out the audio issue with their wireless lavalier set. It all its own charging case, and plugs directly into the side of the osmo action 3. (I don't vlog with large DSLR types anymore for reasons like this, I carry 3 action cams and wireless mics, I get three angles and audio for less than my 15-35 2.8 lol)Why would Canon bring to market this R100 without cheaper prime APSC lens first to address the R10 and R7? My reason for not buying the R10 and instead I bought another M50. If they want to sell the FF $2k-$3k primes already available, why bother making a low end R (No lens) and just keep the M series with some new updates for the vlog market like 4K non cropped to compete with more features than say the Sony ZV-E10?
Then concentrate on the higher end, something in 60mpx-100mpx medium format but smaller than say the R3. Something that a prospective Leica or Hasselblad buyer might be enticed to buy instead? Just wondering aloud.
Another thing that seems no camera mfg addresses with all the vloggers complaints I hear over and over are better audio preamps for hybrid cameras so if a new M6-mk3 or R100, why allow 3rd parties microphones sticking out on top and not "one up" Sony and their deadcat stereo doo-dad? or partner with a Japanese audio company like Roland, Boss, or Tascam or Shure preamp board/chips embedded. Or built in wifi transmitter for clip on lavalier?
I think Canon could easily make something like this to fit their cameras. They just don't seem to want to.
Upvote
0