Are New Features Coming to the EOS R5 Mark II & EOS R1 in February?

Canon Rumors

Who Dey
Canon Rumors Premium
Jul 20, 2010
12,622
5,441
279,596
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
I'll say it right off the top, nailing down when firmware is going to be announced has always been difficult to nearly impossible. Though, the odd time it does work out. We recently saw new firmware for the R5 Mark II and R1, those updates focused more on compatibility and bug fixes than new features. New Features! I have been told that a “firmware announcement” is tentatively scheduled for February ahead of CP+, and that it looks like it'll be announced before it will be available for download. This has happened many times over the years, so it's not a […]

See full article...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
From the post:

"Since the EOS R6 Mark III can have precapture binded to a button, obviously the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R1 can also have the same simple thing added via firmware. I'd be happy if they released a firmware update today just for that alone. Maybe it's a niche thing, but it's annoying for some of us."

...precapture is indispensable for certain tasks, a fact that first became evident (for me) when using an iPhone to gather images.

Simple birthday snapshots are so, so much better with precapture/LIVE view enabled...remarkably so.

Certain bird shots...and almost all sports shots...under certain circumstances precapture makes me look like a much better photographer than I am.;)

It is almost like 'cheating'.

...anything that improves the usability and convenience of Canon's precapture feature?

(y)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0
Adding features by firmware is a non-recurring expense. Once the developers have created the necessary libraries and assuming the the camera has the underlying hardware to support the new functions, there is no additional expense per camera to add it. However, creating a price hierarchy of camera models can be more difficult.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

Precapture Binding​

Since the EOS R6 Mark III can have precapture binded to a button, obviously the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R1 can also have the same simple thing added via firmware. I'd be happy if they released a firmware update today just for that alone. Maybe it's a niche thing, but it's annoying for some of us.

Yes! This would be my biggest ask. Since it is in the R6 III, it makes sense to port to the R5 II and R1. Both these cameras should(?) have longer refresh cycles and matching functionality with the R6 III for simple FW features early in the cycle makes sense. At least it makes owners of the R5 II / R1 happy and more likely to keep R5 / R1 series cameras.

UVC/UAC Live Streaming is another one I would like to see. The R6 III allows the user to set the video output quality up to 4K60p. The R5II/R1 has a fixed 2K30p output. That would be another nice update.

I don't do a lot of video aside from the talking head streaming, so not too sure of those features. Open Gate for instance, isn't that just recording the full sensor as opposed, say, to a 4K subset (or sampling the whole sensor and outputing 4K in oversampled/high quality mode)? If that is the case, doesn't the R5 II (and R5 for that matter) already provide an "Opener" Gate by recording in 8K, as opposed to the R6 III 7K Open Gate?

At any rate, useful feature updates are exciting!!! Aside from features released in the R6 III, we have the features present in in the older cameras like 400MP images in the R5 (which I'd like if they can make it actually work with improved IQ over AI upscaling) and the R3's 195fps burst mode, which is useful for certain settings. These are niche, though, so not sure we'd see Canon spending time on them.

Then there is actual new functionailty that hasn't been introduced before. Unless there is some competitive pressure, I wouldn't expect to see a lot of them, except mabybe some trial features like the 400MP Pixel Shift or the 195fps high burst rate.

What I would expect (ok, hope) is that they would come up with significant AF improvements for the R5 II and R1 that leverage the Digic Accelerator to make the AF capability of these cameras more noticeably better than the non-Accelerated cameras to help differentiate the higher end models.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Adding features by firmware is a non-recurring expense. Once the developers have created the necessary libraries and assuming the the camera has the underlying hardware to support the new functions, there is no additional expense per camera to add it. However, creating a price hierarchy of camera models can be more difficult.
That assumes that the firmware between different camera systems is compatible.
I have never seen Canon source code, but working on Magic Lantern has shown me that there is a lot of variation from camera to camera.
It is much worse now with Digic X.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
That assumes that the firmware between different camera systems is compatible.
I have never seen Canon source code, but working on Magic Lantern has shown me that there is a lot of variation from camera to camera.
It is much worse now with Digic X.
I'm assuming that the RF code architecture is relatively new and was developed from the ground up to be reusable.
 
Upvote 0
What Pinhole said. As a predominate stills shooter, an improved multi-shot mode - especially since Canon seems loathe to exceed 45MP even with their most professional cameras - would be greatly appreciated. Their "AI upscaling" is not up to par and no substitute for real pixels. The other improvements, great for bird and sport shooters and very good for video, don't often apply to my way of working; I only shoot video when my stills clients demand it, and birds and baseball are far from my typical subject matter.
Yes! This would be my biggest ask. Since it is in the R6 III, it makes sense to port to the R5 II and R1. Both these cameras should(?) have longer refresh cycles and matching functionality with the R6 III for simple FW features early in the cycle makes sense. At least it makes owners of the R5 II / R1 happy and more likely to keep R5 / R1 series cameras.

UVC/UAC Live Streaming is another one I would like to see. The R6 III allows the user to set the video output quality up to 4K60p. The R5II/R1 has a fixed 2K30p output. That would be another nice update.

I don't do a lot of video aside from the talking head streaming, so not too sure of those features. Open Gate for instance, isn't that just recording the full sensor as opposed, say, to a 4K subset (or sampling the whole sensor and outputing 4K in oversampled/high quality mode)? If that is the case, doesn't the R5 II (and R5 for that matter) already provide an "Opener" Gate by recording in 8K, as opposed to the R6 III 7K Open Gate?

At any rate, useful feature updates are exciting!!! Aside from features released in the R6 III, we have the features present in in the older cameras like 400MP images in the R5 (which I'd like if they can make it actually work with improved IQ over AI upscaling) and the R3's 195fps burst mode, which is useful for certain settings. These are niche, though, so not sure we'd see Canon spending time on them.

Then there is actual new functionailty that hasn't been introduced before. Unless there is some competitive pressure, I wouldn't expect to see a lot of them, except mabybe some trial features like the 400MP Pixel Shift or the 195fps high burst rate.

What I would expect (ok, hope) is that they would come up with significant AF improvements for the R5 II and R1 that leverage the Digic Accelerator to make the AF capability of these cameras more noticeably better than the non-Accelerated cameras to help differentiate the higher end models.
 
Upvote 0
4k60p Fine is a feature an R5II should be capable of (even just for short bursts), if it already does 8k60p RAW, and it might help more cooling grip sales as well. Maybe they reserve it to the next model, hard to predict their approach.
 
Upvote 0
Have there been any problems/complaints with the new firmware that came out last week (11/26/25)? I ask because I'm about to take a long trip and I don't want to install something that's being problematical.
 
Upvote 0
I have been quite annoyed by precapture not being able to be bound to a button at first. But by now I have found my workaround and have adapted to it.
I use back button focus and just keep pre capture on all the time. Pressing the shutterbutton fully for a normal burst and half pressing it, when I want precapture to do its thing.

The open gate thing is nice to have I guess, but I don't really know, what all the fuzz is about. Never had the feeling that recording in 8k DCI had me longing for even more pixels to crop my image.
Shutter angle would be awesome though.
 
Upvote 0
Shutter Angle would be fantastic.

I don't hop between framerates that much, but when I do, having shutter angle as I do on other cameras just makes life much easier and its one less thing to have to remember.

Id also take open gate recording if its going, features like this wouldn't hurt to have.
 
Upvote 0