At what price point will you consider buying the Canon 6D?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shannon76
  • Start date Start date

At what price point will you consider buying the Canon 6D?

  • I have/will preorder the Canon 6D at $2099.

    Votes: 7 7.4%
  • I will purchase the Canon 6D at $1700-1900.

    Votes: 11 11.7%
  • I will purchase the Canon 6D at $1500-1700.

    Votes: 21 22.3%
  • I will only purchase the Canon 6D after testing show IQ exceeds that of the 5D Mark II.

    Votes: 21 22.3%
  • I won't be purchasing the Canon 6D ever due to lacking features.

    Votes: 34 36.2%

  • Total voters
    94
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
As the so-called "entry-level" FF it should have the entry-level price to match the cut-down specs. It would be the breakthrough product of the year if it had an introductory price south of US$1499. The FF Insurgent/Mutineer/Insurrectionist/Guerrilla that brought 35mm FF digital to The Great Unwashed/Lumpen Proletariat SD card bearers. :P
 
Upvote 0
Sorry, I guess I could have thought out and worded that survey better. I probably could have put estimated times next to the price ranges to also show users willingness to hold out for a while. :) Maybe next time.
Let's say $1700-1900 is 6 months after ship date and $1500-1700 is a year after ship date?
 
Upvote 0
I am optimistic about the sensor performance. I think (or rather I hope) Canon felt the need to cripple the AF in such a spectacular manner (at least on paper) because the IQ will be at par with 5DIII. Can dream, can't I?

With that said, I think this body will be under USD 1800 sooner rather than later and expect to see the kit below USD 2500 before Christmas (assuming the camera is released). At those levels I might consider it but I will definitely wait for the reviews. At USD 1500 I would buy it without giving it much thought (how bad the AF can be?).

It is interesting... If the D600 was a Canon I would have pre-ordered it (I never pre-ordered anything in my life). The 6D, on the other hand, is, as DP aptly described it: uninspiring. I have no problem waiting for the price to fall to a level I feel comfortable paying for a body.
 
Upvote 0
Gothmoth said:
it depends a lot on the sensor performance.. a banding free low iso monster would be very welcome.

I doubt we would see that on the lowest-end camera of Canon's lineup.

I would buy the 6D for 1500$/€, assuming sensor and AF performance are at least decent. That would give me enough saving to buy a nice collection of FF glass, so next time I will have enough money to spend on the body alone.

If I have to buy a 2100$/€ camera (that therefore I must be happy to keep for a longer time), then I'm definitely buying the D600. Due to other expenses I'm planning my purchase for February 2013. Let's see how the situation will be then.
 
Upvote 0
Thought process will go like this, assuming it happens within a year (and there is no 7D replacement on the horizon)

At $1700 I'll start thinking about it

At $1600 I'll take a look at it

At $1500 I'll consider it.

At $1400 I'll probably pick one up. :)
 
Upvote 0
I don't see a reason to buy this over a 5DMk2 which has great build quality and normal sync speed (AND LOWER PRICE). This is an FF sensor in a rebel body - no thanks. Oh and "but it's got half a stop better noise at 6400ISO" excuse is getting old.

LOL am I glad I got that second Mk2 for $2000....
 
Upvote 0
Hi,
Albi86 said:
Gothmoth said:
it depends a lot on the sensor performance.. a banding free low iso monster would be very welcome.

I doubt we would see that on the lowest-end camera of Canon's lineup.

I would buy the 6D for 1500$/€, assuming sensor and AF performance are at least decent. That would give me enough saving to buy a nice collection of FF glass, so next time I will have enough money to spend on the body alone.

If I have to buy a 2100$/€ camera (that therefore I must be happy to keep for a longer time), then I'm definitely buying the D600. Due to other expenses I'm planning my purchase for February 2013. Let's see how the situation will be then.
I saw the Nikon D600 today... look like a D7000. Didn't have the time to play with it, but initial impression is the focusing speed seem a bit slow.

Have a nice day.
 
Upvote 0
weixing said:
Hi,
Albi86 said:
Gothmoth said:
it depends a lot on the sensor performance.. a banding free low iso monster would be very welcome.

I doubt we would see that on the lowest-end camera of Canon's lineup.

I would buy the 6D for 1500$/€, assuming sensor and AF performance are at least decent. That would give me enough saving to buy a nice collection of FF glass, so next time I will have enough money to spend on the body alone.

If I have to buy a 2100$/€ camera (that therefore I must be happy to keep for a longer time), then I'm definitely buying the D600. Due to other expenses I'm planning my purchase for February 2013. Let's see how the situation will be then.
I saw the Nikon D600 today... look like a D7000. Didn't have the time to play with it, but initial impression is the focusing speed seem a bit slow.

Have a nice day.

I'm also looking forward to have one in my hands, but overall I value accuracy more than speed. A FF D7000 is a nice bargain, more or less same as people were hoping the 6D to be a FF 7D.
 
Upvote 0
Brymills said:
With the price reductions on the 5D3 there really is little reason to buy a 6D, unless you need the built in WiFi and GPS features.

The price reduction from $3499 to $3449? MSRP is only down by $50 from launch date. All the other 'deal's are from online stores looking to move product at a faster rate - not from canon. be savy, search for the deals, there is always some entity out there ready to make a deal. But don't deal yourself into the misinformation stream, the camera is still essentially the same cost it was at launch.
 
Upvote 0
The rumored spec list (largely true) and the Adorama Saturday-night special caused me to pull the trigger on the 5D3. At $2750 vs. $2100, there was at least $650 worth of value for me to get what I really wanted. That said, I would gladly pay circa $2k for a full frame camera with the 6D features provided I didn't have to focus and recompose for portraits (that's where they flubbed); with only a center cross-type, the 6D is no more useful to me than my trusty T1i (sensor aside). Having borrowed a friend's 5D3 for a shoot, I've come to appreciate that nailing focus is that much more critical with a full-frame sensor when shoot at a wide aperture (i.e., 1.4 on a crop vs. 1.4 on FF) because of the shallower DOF. Because the 5D3 had useful focus points where I needed them, I didn't have to worry about getting a sharp picture; all I worried about was capturing the right moment. That is worth every penny.

I'm still willing to bet that Canon will be successful with the 6D for the same reasons it was with the 5D2. Folks who want a FF sensor for video will not have to get the 5D3 for very similar output. Just my $0.02.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.