Best FF option

Status
Not open for further replies.
drmikeinpdx said:
...............? If you believe Roger Cicala, only Canon lenses made in the last two years are designed to take advantage of the new system. You may be looking at over $5,500 for a Mark III and one of the new 24-70 II lenses to get true large aperture focus accuracy.

But as others have said, the equipment does not make the photo, you do.

Mike

But as others have said, the equipment does not make the photo, you do. True

But besides that, is there anyone using 5D MK IIIor 1DX and the 24-105 or 70-200 MK II that suffers from this while shooting?
 
Upvote 0
Jotho said:
Really? And in what way is the AF crippled?

well read a bit about cross type sensors and then read the feature list of both cameras.... you may get it.

I am certain it will provide great IQ, AF in line with its price range

a 1200 euro 7D has way better AF then the 6D so what are you trying to tell us here?
the 900 euro 60D has cross type sensors for all AF points.


I think this camera will sell really well, especially with wifi adding extra functionality.

oh yeah as if that means something to an educated customer.
or as if wifi explains the cost of the 6D .. i can buy wifi cards and USB sticks for 15 euro.
wifi chips are cheap... same is true for GPS chips.

and to be honest all kind of crap sells well when there is a brand name printed on it.
because the average joe customer has no clue and only sees a brand name. ::)

the 6D is overpriced... and this says it all:

tijfs.jpg


bewkH.jpg


it´s already a joke....
 
Upvote 0
RC said:
DzPhotography said:
Get a 6D?
Love to know why you recommend a 6D?
I would have thought a 6D would be exactly what you need if you're just after a second body for the 7D to do architectual, landscapes, portraits etc as you won't need the more advanced AF capabilities and frame speed of the 7D or 5Diii aren't needed here. Keep some cash in your pocket instead.

I'd assume the image quality would be on par with other full frame options. In fact, the lower MPs might even lead to lower noise if doing night time architectual shots. The only real down side seems to be the slower flash synch speed.
 
Upvote 0
M.ST said:
For stills and landscapes go for a used 1Ds Mark III or new 5D Mark II.
I sold my 5D Mark III because the camera can´t reach the image quality of the 1Ds Mark III and 5D Mark II (from ISO 50 to ISO 800).

Can you please elaborate on 5D Mark II part? Are you referring to the stronger AA filter or is it something else?
I ask because I am thinking of a 5DMkIII to keep company to my ... 5DMkII
 
Upvote 0
My 5DIII just arrived, and so far I'm really impressed. The images are very sharp, take post well, and have excellent color. If you can get in on one of the Ebay deals, its totally worth every penny of the cost difference over a 6D. I totally believe those folks that never regretted paying full price...its an awesome machine.

Just a note on the AF system - it is only the newer lenses that work with the closed loop feedback capability of the AF system. All lenses, regardless of age, will still benefit from the sensitivity and number of AF points available. So you do not NEED brand new lenses to take wide aperture photos. Just as you can get sharp photos at 1.2 on a 5DII, you can get them with the same lens on a 5DIII. If the lens had the new position feedback sensor it would just be EVEN MORE reliable.

All that said, I was going to get the 6D if the Ebay thing hadn't happened. It looks like a great all around camera for non-sport shooters, and you have that piece covered with yoru 7D.

-Brian
 
Upvote 0
Jotho said:
Canon-F1 said:
Jotho said:
RC said:
DzPhotography said:
Get a 6D?
Love to know why you recommend a 6D?
I didn't recommend it, but what would be wrong with it? It's a nicely priced camera with a lot of cool features. At this stage it would be futile to say anything about IQ etc, wait until reviews come out before ruling it out.

please what is nicely priced?

it´s a AF crippled 60D with a FF sensor for twice as much money.

Really? And in what way is the AF crippled? I try to see it for what it is as I explained above. I think this camera will sell really well, especially with wifi adding extra functionality. I am certain it will provide great IQ, AF in line with its price range and adding to that Canon's fine lens line up. Neither of us have seen the camera yet so it's quite childish to bash it for qualities or lack of qualities that you don't have any idea of.


Whilst we cannot comment on it image quality just yet it does have the following upgrades over the 5D MkII adding to the price of the MkII

Newer sensor delivering more MP and a much better ISO range (hopefully IQ qill be just as good as the MkII)
Newer updated rear screen.
GPS and Wifi
Better AF especially in low light than the MkII

For a price a little more than the MkII so lets hope the IQ is there and the 5D MkII 'lives on' in the 6D
 
Upvote 0
Octavian said:
Whilst we cannot comment on it image quality just yet it does have the following upgrades over the 5D MkII adding to the price of the MkII

Newer sensor delivering more MP and a much better ISO range (hopefully IQ qill be just as good as the MkII)

since when is 20.2 MP more then 21.1 MP ??? ???

GPS and Wifi

costs 50 euro... maybe...

at 1699 euro the 6D would be a deal... at 2099 euro it´s a joke.
 
Upvote 0
Many people, myself included, wrestled with or are wrestling with the same problem. I have a 7D but wanted to add FF body to my gear. Same reasons as you mentioned. I had heard rumors of a 5D II replacement for some time and waited. But then I saw the 5D II going cheaper than ever and bought it before it became discontinued. It a tried and tested camera and a classic. Its an honor just to own one! FF ability is all i wanted, and who cares about fancy extras? Its how you use it that counts!
 
Upvote 0
Generally speaking I would recommend a new 5DII while still available. The problem is that you are looking at full 600RT support. I don't think that's going to happen with the Mark II. not even sure if a firmware update could establish that. This may be an actual hardware limitation.
So that brings you to the Mark III...
 
Upvote 0
RC said:
Mulling over what my best FF option is now that the (pathetic) 6D has been officially announced. I want to add a FF body for landscape, architecture, portrait, and flash work. I would like to get it soon, preferably before year's end, but could wait as long as March 2013 if there is a reason to wait. I consider myself a passionate hobbyist, I do not make any money or plan to from photog. I’m interested in the CR community’s thoughts and suggestions.


Option 1:

Option 2:


Option 3:

Option 4:

Option 5:

I am actually in more or less the same boat as you are with a 7D, TS/E 17, EF 50 1.4, 24-105, and 70-200 IS MKI. I see a need for having a good FF with options to shoot some portraiture and landscapes with no immediate desire to shoot at high burst rate. I love the 1DX, but it will have to wait. So that leaves me with 5DI/II/III, 6D, or used 1DS if staying with Canon. However, with cheaper 35, 50 1.8 glasses from Nikon with the venerable 14-24, buying D600 looks like a good option, while not getting rid of any Canon gear - may be the 50. 6D just feels like lack of attention to details from Canon. Nikon also has intervalometer, bracketing for HDR that make D600 more interesting buy.
 
Upvote 0
philsv77 said:
Get 5d3 when the price comes down to ~$2.5k

How long will that take? 2 maybe 3 years?? ;)

Even then $2500 isn't exactly budget, you could have bought a 5D II for $1500 and put the extra towards some really good glass.

But let's all just wait and see how this 6D performs, with a digic 5+ processor and new CMOS sensor it should be a bit of alright I reckon. :o It's getting a lot of flak because it doesn't have this thing or that thing. Most people who will buy it will be amateurs coming from a rebel or XXD and will already have a stack of SD cards and only use the center AF point anyway.

Or stick with the 7D and just put the money towards a vacation! Just puttin it out there!
 
Upvote 0
Thanks to all for your suggestions and ideas.

I’m going to sit tight for a while and not purchase anything. I’m keeping my 7D since it’s worth much more to me than what I’d probably get for it. I’m trying to keep an open mind on the 6D, I’ll wait for sample images and reviews. I’ll give some time to see where the 5D3 prices go. Maybe over the holidays there will be another smoking deal like the Adorama eBay sale or maybe next year this rumored high MP camera will push the 5D3 down but I really doubt it will drop to or below $3000 for a very long time.

It’s frustrating because I’ve got money saved up to spend but Canon is not offering me anything that I’m willing to spend it on. IMO Canon really blew it on this 6D, all it really needs is a more advanced AF (more points, more crosses), and a 100% VF. I can choke down the SD only since it’s a low FPS camera. But looking at the whole picture, there are too many compromises and downgrades for me coming from a 7D. Canon offers the 5D3 for pro users, the 6D for beginners but nothing for us enthusiasts/hobbyists. The 5D3 is wonderful but it's more than I want to spend at $3500. :(
 
Upvote 0
Z-06 said:
RC said:
Mulling over what my best FF option is now that the (pathetic) 6D has been officially announced. I want to add a FF body for landscape, architecture, portrait, and flash work. I would like to get it soon, preferably before year's end, but could wait as long as March 2013 if there is a reason to wait. I consider myself a passionate hobbyist, I do not make any money or plan to from photog. I’m interested in the CR community’s thoughts and suggestions.


Option 1:

Option 2:


Option 3:

Option 4:

Option 5:

I am actually in more or less the same boat as you are with a 7D, TS/E 17, EF 50 1.4, 24-105, and 70-200 IS MKI. I see a need for having a good FF with options to shoot some portraiture and landscapes with no immediate desire to shoot at high burst rate. I love the 1DX, but it will have to wait. So that leaves me with 5DI/II/III, 6D, or used 1DS if staying with Canon. However, with cheaper 35, 50 1.8 glasses from Nikon with the venerable 14-24, buying D600 looks like a good option, while not getting rid of any Canon gear - may be the 50. 6D just feels like lack of attention to details from Canon. Nikon also has intervalometer, bracketing for HDR that make D600 more interesting buy.
Sure, why not get rid of excellent Canon lenses and go to Nikon? Oh by the way, if you get rid of 50 1.4 you will become rich! ;D
 
Upvote 0
mrk 2 could be interesting, as if you are only using low iso's then it wont matter to yeah? mrk 3 is a nice camera.

imo, how about you try renting out a few bodies, for a day or however long you feel and then you make a decision like that? because I feel that buying camera bodies is sometimes like buying speakers. you can read 10000000 reviews but you gotta hear it (or in this case try it out)

have you done this at all yet??
 
Upvote 0
CatfishSoupFTW said:
mrk 2 could be interesting, as if you are only using low iso's then it wont matter to yeah? mrk 3 is a nice camera.

imo, how about you try renting out a few bodies, for a day or however long you feel and then you make a decision like that? because I feel that buying camera bodies is sometimes like buying speakers. you can read 10000000 reviews but you gotta hear it (or in this case try it out)

have you done this at all yet??

Probably a good idea, got a good rental shop not far from my house

crasher8 said:
I don't give a crap about a few hundred dollars now that I've spent a week with my 5d3. I can't believe I ever really had a clean image with the 7D. Why didn't I go FF sooner!

It's comments like this that do keep the 5D3 door open for me. :)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.