[email protected] said:zim said:ahsanford said:An extra couple of fps wouldn't go amiss either!
+7 to +10
+1 on that! Maybe push it to 8-9 and 10 with MLU.
My only reason is hoping the 6D II can have >/= 6fps![]()
RickSpringfield said:- A camera already on the roadmap (2017/2018) will all but obsolete the 5D Mark IV or significantly impact its perceived marketplace value
RickSpringfield said:- Canon decided to embrace the idea that products can start in a place, but when they are enhanced frequently they will draw people to the brand (Fuji'esque)
- 5D Mark IV isn't the runaway hit they hoped for internally and if software enhancements bring in more consumers its an easy way to boost those sales or sustain the current sales for a longer run
- A camera already on the roadmap (2017/2018) will all but obsolete the 5D Mark IV or significantly impact its perceived marketplace value
ahsanford said:I'm curious -- I'm not a video person (at all) but I always find post-market 'upgrades' like the 7D1's firmware upgrade as a chance to breathe energy into a brand. Mid-cycle of a product, legit upgrades like this make sense to signal the brand will still be around for a while / a refresh isn't coming soon.
But to do it within the first year might imply two very different things:
- It wasn't ready at time of launch but now they've got it working well and feel comfortable offering it.
- It may have always been working on the camera but it was locked out in firmware to protect higher brand-level camera prices. Perhaps enough people complained that feature wasn't included / Canon underestimated the necessity of that feature such that Canon felt the need to unlock it.
Just curious why Canon wouldn't have this at launch but they are offering/unlocking it now.
- A
testthewest said:ahsanford said:I'm curious -- I'm not a video person (at all) but I always find post-market 'upgrades' like the 7D1's firmware upgrade as a chance to breathe energy into a brand. Mid-cycle of a product, legit upgrades like this make sense to signal the brand will still be around for a while / a refresh isn't coming soon.
But to do it within the first year might imply two very different things:
- It wasn't ready at time of launch but now they've got it working well and feel comfortable offering it.
- It may have always been working on the camera but it was locked out in firmware to protect higher brand-level camera prices. Perhaps enough people complained that feature wasn't included / Canon underestimated the necessity of that feature such that Canon felt the need to unlock it.
Just curious why Canon wouldn't have this at launch but they are offering/unlocking it now.
- A
Well, thank the complainers! We get vilified for complaining all the time by some of the high-post-count regulars, but in the end, complains get you features, either through updates or the next camera model.
Being satisfied with suboptimal things just leads to more suboptimal things.
jayphotoworks said:I was actually beginning to enjoy using the camera assembling Pro-Res 7K timelapse sequences in LRtimelapse until I got to the 4K MJPEG files. Hello slideshow! I'm editing on a dual Xeon 6 core, 64GB ram, ssd boot, ssd cache, 8TB on a Raid-6 array with a dedicated LSI MegaRaid controller.
privatebydesign said:testthewest said:ahsanford said:I'm curious -- I'm not a video person (at all) but I always find post-market 'upgrades' like the 7D1's firmware upgrade as a chance to breathe energy into a brand. Mid-cycle of a product, legit upgrades like this make sense to signal the brand will still be around for a while / a refresh isn't coming soon.
But to do it within the first year might imply two very different things:
- It wasn't ready at time of launch but now they've got it working well and feel comfortable offering it.
- It may have always been working on the camera but it was locked out in firmware to protect higher brand-level camera prices. Perhaps enough people complained that feature wasn't included / Canon underestimated the necessity of that feature such that Canon felt the need to unlock it.
Just curious why Canon wouldn't have this at launch but they are offering/unlocking it now.
- A
Well, thank the complainers! We get vilified for complaining all the time by some of the high-post-count regulars, but in the end, complains get you features, either through updates or the next camera model.
Being satisfied with suboptimal things just leads to more suboptimal things.
Why? Complainers move nothing forwards, sales numbers and perceived opportunities for them have driven this change not complaints.
The 5D MkIV is not "suboptimal" for many users in any area, Canon have decided they want more sales and think they can get them with a firmware upgrade to enhance a specific user base not currently covered.
Look at any like product sales placement in any market and the 5D MkIV is at or near the top. Doesn't stop Canon seeing another possible niche, and anybody that doesn't call a need for shooting C-Log a niche is just in denial.
testthewest said:You are very wrong about all you said in here. Complainers move history forward. The whole construct called USA is just in existence because of complains (about british taxation and representation to be exact).
Also Canon does not think this move will make a sudden change in sales. It is more a point of retaining position and preserving some reputation gained by the 5D series. That's why they push out content asked by complainers.
They no longer can afford the bad press they got from the video folks, if they want to sell them cameras in the future.
privatebydesign said:So you think the rest of the world is looking at the USA and thinking 'they are really moving history forwards, lets listen to them and copy what they do/want'?