Camera Crossroads :)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well I'm looking for opinions right now. My only job with photography, it looks like this year, will be sports. Nothing but college sports. I have a 1DX, 2 5D3's I was shooting weddings with, a 1D4, and a 1Ds3. Obviously now I don't need all of those cameras since weddings will go to about nil and it'll be all about sports. I need 2 bodies at each sporting event. Obviously if I kept my cameras I'd go 1DX/1D4. However, if I sold some cameras, I could afford another 1DX and maybe a longer lens (currently have the 400 f/2.8L IS which I think is plenty long on the 1D4, but if I didn't have the 1D4, not sure for track).

My current position is to sell a 5D3, the 1D4, and the 1Ds3, and buying a 1DX, giving me a pair of 1DX's and a 5D3. I could probably budget down the road either a newer 400mm lens or a 500mm lens. I'm not in a bind or anything, I was just looking for some opinions on what you might do if you were going to primarily shoot sports, but do some weddings here and there. Thanks!
 

Quasimodo

Easily intrigued :)
Feb 5, 2012
977
2
51
Oslo, Norway
www.500px.com
I am not in your league, being a amateur (with a few paid gigs a year). However, I think it is hard to weigh in given that I don't know your sports (wast difference if it is soccer, American footbal, or basket), so it is hard to know your range requirements. Is the sports you shoot fast sports? If so, I would opt for another 1DX, then you have two 1DX with a 70-200 F2.8 IS II on one, and a 500 on the other?
 
Upvote 0
Quasimodo said:
I am not in your league, being a amateur (with a few paid gigs a year). However, I think it is hard to weigh in given that I don't know your sports (wast difference if it is soccer, American footbal, or basket), so it is hard to know your range requirements. Is the sports you shoot fast sports? If so, I would opt for another 1DX, then you have two 1DX with a 70-200 F2.8 IS II on one, and a 500 on the other?

Thanks for responding. Yeah it's hard to say. I'd say at track and field, 400 might be a tad short for long distance curve shots for fast action relay hand offs, etc. I don't really want to buy a 500mm lens for track only. The other sports yes, are fast action. Football I think given the fact that I'll be on the sidelines 400mm is plenty and most of the time I'd be shooting with a 300mm lens anyways. Indoor sports won't require anything longer than 200mm. I guess I just don't know if the sacrifice in IQ with the 1D4 for the extra reach is worth it. I know for indoor sports I won't use the 1D4 because I just don't like the high ISO (6400) on that camera vs. the 1DX and 5D3. It's a tough decision.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 18, 2011
1,026
81
bdunbar79 said:
My current position is to sell a 5D3, the 1D4, and the 1Ds3, and buying a 1DX, giving me a pair of 1DX's and a 5D3. I could probably budget down the road either a newer 400mm lens or a 500mm lens. I'm not in a bind or anything, I was just looking for some opinions on what you might do if you were going to primarily shoot sports, but do some weddings here and there. Thanks!
What about ending up with a two 1DX's and the 1D4? The 1DX's would more than cover you for pretty much everything (indoors, weddings, etc), and the 1DIV would allow your 400mm lens to cover the track portions you need the extra reach for. The re-sale value difference between the 5dIII and 1D4 is what, $1000? Compare that to maybe needing to buy the 500mm or 600mm and that's nothing.

Two 1DX's and a 5dIII just seems odd...I'm not sure you'd ever actually use the 5dIII, because the 1DX does everything it does, only better.
 
Upvote 0
preppyak said:
bdunbar79 said:
My current position is to sell a 5D3, the 1D4, and the 1Ds3, and buying a 1DX, giving me a pair of 1DX's and a 5D3. I could probably budget down the road either a newer 400mm lens or a 500mm lens. I'm not in a bind or anything, I was just looking for some opinions on what you might do if you were going to primarily shoot sports, but do some weddings here and there. Thanks!
What about ending up with a two 1DX's and the 1D4? The 1DX's would more than cover you for pretty much everything (indoors, weddings, etc), and the 1DIV would allow your 400mm lens to cover the track portions you need the extra reach for. The re-sale value difference between the 5dIII and 1D4 is what, $1000? Compare that to maybe needing to buy the 500mm or 600mm and that's nothing.

Two 1DX's and a 5dIII just seems odd...I'm not sure you'd ever actually use the 5dIII, because the 1DX does everything it does, only better.

That's actually a superb idea. Thanks.
 
Upvote 0
Mar 25, 2011
16,847
1,835
I agree on keeping the 1D MK IV. I'd also hold off a little and look at the 200-400mmL when it arrives this fall. With the built-in TC, it becomes a 280-560mm zoom on FF, and longer on the 1D MK IV.
It really sounds handy for sports. There will likely be a lot of reviews from Olympic shooters who have loaners from Canon.
 
Upvote 0
Thanks guys. As much as I like my 22mp cameras, they're not going to make me any money whereas the 1DX and 1D4 will. 18mp is plenty for wedding photography anyways, as I usually only crop down to about 12-14mp off a 21mp shot. And Mt. Spokane, thanks for the heads up on the 200-400L potential announcement this fall. That would certainly come in handy down the road.
 
Upvote 0
Nov 17, 2011
5,514
17
bdunbar79 said:
Well I'm looking for opinions right now. My only job with photography, it looks like this year, will be sports. Nothing but college sports. I have a 1DX, 2 5D3's I was shooting weddings with, a 1D4, and a 1Ds3. Obviously now I don't need all of those cameras since weddings will go to about nil and it'll be all about sports. I need 2 bodies at each sporting event. Obviously if I kept my cameras I'd go 1DX/1D4. However, if I sold some cameras, I could afford another 1DX and maybe a longer lens (currently have the 400 f/2.8L IS which I think is plenty long on the 1D4, but if I didn't have the 1D4, not sure for track).

My current position is to sell a 5D3, the 1D4, and the 1Ds3, and buying a 1DX, giving me a pair of 1DX's and a 5D3. I could probably budget down the road either a newer 400mm lens or a 500mm lens. I'm not in a bind or anything, I was just looking for some opinions on what you might do if you were going to primarily shoot sports, but do some weddings here and there. Thanks!

I would go for it :) Two best bodies plus 5D III as backup.....I'm drooling
 
Upvote 0
MarkWebbPhoto said:
bdunbar79 said:
As long as you guys think 18mp is no big deal vs. 22mp, I'm comfortable with that decision.

I've got my 1DX but I'm going to hold out for a high megapixel camera like a 1DXs or something as a second body. Until then I will continue to use my 5D2 and 1D4!

Mark, if 400mm is plenty long for any sports for you on a FF camera, I can sell the 1D4 and keep the 5D Mark III, which I really like. I think 2 1DX's for sports and the 5D3 for high mp camera sounds good too. However, if 400mm is a bit short in your opinion, I will keep the 1D4 and wait like you are for a higher mp camera. Problem is I can't see much difference 18 vs 22mp, but that's still 4000 less pixels.

wickidwombat,

If I went that route, of course you can look at purchasing the 1D4. I bought it in early May to finish up the outdoor track season and that's all I've shot with it. When purchased, the EOS Utility showed something like 7k actuations. I may have 10k total, but I'll run the Utility again. I guess I could always keep the 1Ds3, but that doesn't do well in low light and I will need that.

Oh decisions, decisions.
 
Upvote 0
wickidwombat said:
Keeping a 5d3 will be valuable for its silent shutter if you shoot golf, tennis anything where someone might brain you with a club or raquet if they get the sh!ts on also if you are mainly shooting with 2 1 series bodies then you just keep it in you bag with a wide lens on to grab the odd total scene shot

Tennis is a concern yes. I've not done tennis before. Basketball is loud anyways and football, well...

I'll probably, no matter what, hang on to the 5D Mark III, whether I end up with a pair of 1DX's or not. I would really like to keep one of my highest mp cameras. If I had just a bit more money I'd hang on to the 1Ds3 but economically it may not make sense.
 
Upvote 0
Do you not think three cameras is overkill? Unless you plan on linking them all wirelessly and trigger them that way two would suffice wouldn't it?

Reach is always good, so I would keep the 1D Mark IV and 1D X and sell the rest and buy new glass.

I like Mt Spokane Photography's idea of the new 200-400 lens.

How did you end up with so many cameras anyway?
 
Upvote 0
expatinasia said:
Do you not think three cameras is overkill? Unless you plan on linking them all wirelessly and trigger them that way two would suffice wouldn't it?

Reach is always good, so I would keep the 1D Mark IV and 1D X and sell the rest and buy new glass.

I like Mt Spokane Photography's idea of the new 200-400 lens.

How did you end up with so many cameras anyway?

I guess as time went on, I replaced all my old cameras with a new one. Had a 7D and 5D2, and got a 5D3 in place of those two. Then I stopped actually replacing them. Kept the 1Ds3 when I did that. However I did a few weddings and got another 5D3 because I was using that heavily and the convenience of two helped. The 1D4 I got in May to pick up the end of the track season. Oh and you can see how it went. Should have sold, much like I did my 7D and 5D2, as I went along.

I don't think 3 is overkill. I take two to every event. Sometimes the 3rd has a greater strength at one thing than another. So it could be A/B, A/C, or B/C, depending on what I'm doing. In THIS case though, sports is going to be it. I always carry two bodies to every event. But I'm only doing sports, then yeah, why have 3? I guess I'm not thrilled with the 1D4's IQ compared to the 5D3 or 1DX, but it certainly has that extra reach. In track the 400mm lens I have becomes 520. That's tough to beat, especially at low ISO.
 
Upvote 0
B

briansquibb

Guest
Are you planning to do anything other than sports? If not then it would be worth getting more specialist kit.

If you are planning to do other things then versatility needs to be factored in.

3 bodies are fine - means one can be repaired whilst the other two are being used.

I just sent both 1Ds for cleaning/service, the 1D4 will go on their return, by which time the 1DX should be here.

I can always fall back on the 10D/5Dc combo if needed ::) ::) ::)
 
Upvote 0
Well, since yes, things have changed for me and it looks like it'll be a full sports contract for a university this whole school year. I have ONE wedding on November 3, which by this time I'll have to cut all weddings out. My question is whether I will need the 5D3 at all. Or should I keep the 1D4 and pickup another 1DX. I refuse to use the 1D4 for indoor sports if the 1DX is in my kit, I mean why not? I don't need the reach but I do need the high ISO capabilities. Outdoors, at low ISO though, I can use the reach. I always carry two bodies, so my decision will be two 1DX's with either 1. 5D3, or 2. 1D4. It is certain the one of my 5D3's and the 1Ds3 has to go. Maybe the 1DX is so good I only need the 1DX and 1D4, two bodies. Of course then I would only bring one body to volleyball, basketball, wrestling, and indoor track. I'm thinking the 1DX is an okay replacement for the 5D3 even in resolution. That's what I'm trying to determine. It appears as though, when you take shots of say a wheat field, the detail is greater from the 1DX whereas the 5D3 seems to sort of blend the grass blades together. This is irrelevent in sports though.

I'll probably at first keep a 1DX, a 1D4, and a 5D3 and if I need to do anything else later I will. I will not be shooting tennis with a 1DX, way too loud.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.