4k may not be a dealbreaker today, but we're talking about a camera that *may* be announced in 2016, and if so will be expected, based on history, to sell until 2020.
Upvote
0
Canon Rumors said:Chaitanya said:So even in 2016 stupid arse Canon will not add 4k support to their camera that might be priced north of 2500$.
The vast majority of 5D buyers don't care about 4K video.
Canon Rumors said:Chaitanya said:So even in 2016 stupid arse Canon will not add 4k support to their camera that might be priced north of 2500$.
The vast majority of 5D buyers don't care about 4K video.
I guess for those wanting Nikon D810 features or Sony 7R series features those cameras are freely on sale. I would hope Canon provides Canon features like the improved mirror box or reinforced base plate I have in the 5DS or the 50.6 MP sensor that for landscape makes it a stand-out camera. I dont care about its video abilities Im never going to use them but the cropping facility, mRaw etc. are all useful. It seems the biggest critics of Canon are Canon users and the grass is always greener on the other side. I hope Canon does improve DR in any 5D MKIII replacement but I equally hope they keep the MP count below 30MP at between 26-28MP because the pixel pitch does have a sweet spot and thats not 50MP which is more specialist.glness said:I know this is only a CR2 level rumor, but this would make no sense to me at all. The Nikon flagship workhorse FF cameras are their 800 series: 36mp, low noise, great AF, and industry-leading DR. I assume Nikon will soon have a 900 series – or whatever they call it – employing the new 42mp Sony chip. Again, it will probably become their workhorse high-end camera with low noise, impressive DR, great AF, likely with 4K video, and probably be capable of shooting about 6 fps.
Why would Canon launch a new 5D Mark IV that doesn't even match the now almost four-year-old Nikon D800? Today I own a 1D X (mostly for wildlife) and 5D III (mostly for landscape). I'd probably upgrade to the 1D X Mark II if it is 24mp with 15 fps, but there is no way I would buy a 5D Mark IV if it was only 4mp more. Canon needs a great breakthrough workhorse camera in the high 30mp range to fit between their new 1D X Mark II and their 50mp 5DS/5DS R.
5Ds is more in line with the category of where the D810 stands. The 5D3 and future 5D4 are more directly compared to the D750. The D750 was made to be the true wedding and general do-it-all camera from Nikon. If the MP count of the 5D4 goes up to 28MP and it does 8+ FPS, I don't see the D8XX series competing for the same usage unless Nikon comes out with an 8+ FPS camera. They would also have to deal with buffer clearing and buffer depth which would be hurt by using 36+ MP.glness said:I know this is only a CR2 level rumor, but this would make no sense to me at all. The Nikon flagship workhorse FF cameras are their 800 series: 36mp, low noise, great AF, and industry-leading DR. I assume Nikon will soon have a 900 series – or whatever they call it – employing the new 42mp Sony chip. Again, it will probably become their workhorse high-end camera with low noise, impressive DR, great AF, likely with 4K video, and probably be capable of shooting about 6 fps.
Why would Canon launch a new 5D Mark IV that doesn't even match the now almost four-year-old Nikon D800? Today I own a 1D X (mostly for wildlife) and 5D III (mostly for landscape). I'd probably upgrade to the 1D X Mark II if it is 24mp with 15 fps, but there is no way I would buy a 5D Mark IV if it was only 4mp more. Canon needs a great breakthrough workhorse camera in the high 30mp range to fit between their new 1D X Mark II and their 50mp 5DS/5DS R.
Canon Rumors said:Chaitanya said:So even in 2016 stupid arse Canon will not add 4k support to their camera that might be priced north of 2500$.
The vast majority of 5D buyers don't care about 4K video.
douglaurent said:Canon Rumors said:Chaitanya said:So even in 2016 stupid arse Canon will not add 4k support to their camera that might be priced north of 2500$.
The vast majority of 5D buyers don't care about 4K video.
Really? I bought a total of six 5D2 and 5D3, and i wouldn't have bought more than one without the video function. Never met anyone who used it because of photo only!
OPG said:clarksbrother said:OPG said:I'll definitely remember that the next time I need to get out of my armchair and walk into my studio! ;D
![]()
I'll also remember that that image is from the studio of Marcelo Isarrualde. I mean really... :![]()
It's the thought of a well designed studio that counts! ;D
Thanks for knowing the name. I was looking all over for it.
jeffa4444 said:I guess for those wanting Nikon D810 features or Sony 7R series features those cameras are freely on sale. I would hope Canon provides Canon features like the improved mirror box or reinforced base plate I have in the 5DS or the 50.6 MP sensor that for landscape makes it a stand-out camera. I dont care about its video abilities Im never going to use them but the cropping facility, mRaw etc. are all useful. It seems the biggest critics of Canon are Canon users and the grass is always greener on the other side. I hope Canon does improve DR in any 5D MKIII replacement but I equally hope they keep the MP count below 30MP at between 26-28MP because the pixel pitch does have a sweet spot and thats not 50MP which is more specialist.glness said:I know this is only a CR2 level rumor, but this would make no sense to me at all. The Nikon flagship workhorse FF cameras are their 800 series: 36mp, low noise, great AF, and industry-leading DR. I assume Nikon will soon have a 900 series – or whatever they call it – employing the new 42mp Sony chip. Again, it will probably become their workhorse high-end camera with low noise, impressive DR, great AF, likely with 4K video, and probably be capable of shooting about 6 fps.
Why would Canon launch a new 5D Mark IV that doesn't even match the now almost four-year-old Nikon D800? Today I own a 1D X (mostly for wildlife) and 5D III (mostly for landscape). I'd probably upgrade to the 1D X Mark II if it is 24mp with 15 fps, but there is no way I would buy a 5D Mark IV if it was only 4mp more. Canon needs a great breakthrough workhorse camera in the high 30mp range to fit between their new 1D X Mark II and their 50mp 5DS/5DS R.
jeffa4444 said:I hope Canon does improve DR in any 5D MKIII replacement but I equally hope they keep the MP count below 30MP at between 26-28MP because the pixel pitch does have a sweet spot and thats not 50MP which is more specialist.