On wide-aperture bokeh...
I'm often guilty of overdoing it, and even so, sometimes I'd like to take it even further! For me, it's something that is nearly impossible to achieve in painting (without a photographic reference). Possibly, after software calculated depth of field becomes common, it'll lose it's appeal with me and others over doing it now, but will bet money a much greater number of people will be enjoying overdoing it on their cell phones...
Today, it's a primary distinguishing visual element between amateur shots and professional shots. The AI bokeh stuff is pretty terrible right now, but I'm sure it'll get to be great soon. I think this is a bit arbitrary, of course, mostly because the better photos they see tend to be shot by people with big lenses. Their aesthetic has been affected by this funny, arbitrary distinction in the suppliers of images.
[AI velocity example: Four weeks ago I hired a person in Colombia to do 25 minutes of speaking with me as I'm learning Spanish. Cost me $10, and it was useful. Two weeks ago, I got an account using Microsoft's AI thingamabob, and told it I spoke Spanish as a primary language, and was doing the same thing for free with the AI in the text box. I thought to myself, "Wow, this is really cool. I bet someday we could do this by voice." Two days ago, I upgraded my Duolingo app so that I got the ChatGTP feature, and I'm speaking to my phone, having a full dialog in (bad) Spanish on any topic I want, and it's telling me precisely where I'm making mistakes, and even giving me alternate phrasings. I feel that in less than a month, I've personally travelled about 10 years in tech development. Of course, given that the Japanese camera makers are, um, different, we're not going to see that sort of velocity here.]
My prediction is that until that AI stuff gets to be unweird when published at 300 dpi in a magazine, the wide aperture, deep bokeh effect will continue to give a photo a "pro" feeling, and will be part of the current desired style. Once the AI not only develops, but winds up in cameras (not post processing), then it will likely move the market's desire to a more rational aesthetic.
I teach photography to some people, ranging from random parents to editorial staffs at magazines. When I talk about aperture, I show them a bunch of slides and ask them to tell me what they feel about the quality of the photos. Wide aperture is the single factor most associated with a sense of high quality. I think this is only partly due to better subect isolation.