EOS M6 Mark II
- Jan 27, 2020
Do these specs, seem more like an R2, than the RS? Maybe we get both?
I dont see 12-20fps camera with 45mp mirorless, whats the 1dxiii for then? No one would buy it anymore
I hope it’s still gonna be 75mp be I I shoot cinematic portraits and I crop them with a 16:9 ratio so I’m having to lose pixels in the crop and then I print large but like the resolution because I want viewers to get up close and look at details.what on earth can you NOT do with 45mb that hinders you, im curious!
If it is factual... I can't wait to read the complainers when released. "This should have been 150mp."For the first time on CR I totally skipped all the comments. The powers that be sure like to get us all revved up so that we can natter and complain for weeks afterwards when it's not even close to being factual! I refuse to be drawn into this.
I'm not worried about the 1D X III sale. It's not meant for the mass public camera enthusiasts whatsoever.
Even if the specs are true, professional would still buy the 1Dx III.
I am (more than) OK with this part
Irrespective of video features which I do not believe them.
- 45mp (One source said 40mp)
- 5 stops with IBIS alone
- 7-8 stops of correction when used with in-lens stabilization
- 14fps / 20fps (One source said 12fps / 20fps)
- Scroll wheel added to the back
- No touchbar
- Liveview/Movie toggle like previous EOS DSLRs
- Larger capacity battery, but looks like the LP-E6
BUT I do not believe the stills photo part either.
This would consolide the high megapixel and the MkV equivalent to one body (especially if it was 40Mpixels and it had 2 cards).
Not bad at all but this is so not Canon. They can but they will get more money from 2 bodies. Even Nikon made D780 with the same mpixel count of D750 (and bettered almost every other aspect).
So I believe Canon will make a similar model (with video specs a notch down) but with 30Mpixels and a much higher one with even less video capabilities and much lower frame rates.
At 40 to 45 megapixels? That will be a disappointment for me. I've been a heavy investor to the R system because I was expecting resolution to at least beat my 5DSR.
What prevents you from framing properly to begin with? Curious.I hope it’s still gonna be 75mp be I I shoot cinematic portraits and I crop them with a 16:9 ratio so I’m having to lose pixels in the crop and then I print large but like the resolution because I want viewers to get up close and look at details.
They will not do it like that. By the moment you will spend your money on one they will announce the otherI'm an Olympus EM1m2 user with their pro lenses, eagerly waiting to enter FF by getting one of these 2 R bodies and a RF 70-200mm f2.8 for starters. Since it looks like one is 40-45MP and another 75MP or so, I would be ecstatic to have either one.
Canon has a chance to give a body blow to the sales of Sony FF & APS-C both if they pull off these kinds of specs. And I'm one person that *must* have a fully articulating screen and I get it with Canon and can't with Sony - yay!
Hurry up Canon, and show both, so I can decide which one to buy!