Unerstand that I'm stills + OVF obsessed, and that's not the full picture throughput-wise. DPAF, video, tracking, etc. are not concerns of mine but certainly may represent a serious load on the processing.
So please take my very crude MP x fps examples as just one nutty way of looking at throughput. Other far brighter people than I on this forum will give you better answers on this.
- A
I think it's wise to keep talking about this stuff, despite us not all being mechanical and electronic engineers, as long as we're being reasonable and are willing to admit when someone more educated/knowledgeable can offer better information.
Continuing to speculate:
Like the 1DX Mk. III, the M6 mk. II also has DPAF, video, and tracking that it has to do, apparently while pushing more image data. I
do think that the specs revealed in this announcement, married to the price of the system, merit some degree of skepticism (and indeed, some of the commentary here
is asking meaningful questions about what consumers are meant to pay for when they invest in this body) ---- before I get flamed, let add that I'm not devaluing the design, the weather sealing, the usability, or the toughness --- although, to be fair, the 1D series did already innovate many of these things years ago . . .