EOS RE-1 - Anything new?

Jan 25, 2016
182
158
578
11610.jpg

Any news about this camera, @Canon Rumors ?

And what specs are on your wishlist @everybody? I wouldn't mind if it just had R6 Mark II internals and some new picture styles. Probably very unrealistic but built in VSCO or RNI film simulation would be awesome.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Here's some information that Perplexity AI assumes, most is pretty obvious:

A Canon RE-1, as a digital remake of the iconic AE-1, would combine retro design elements with modern digital features, aiming to appeal to nostalgic users and enthusiasts of tactile photography experiences. Canon is rumored to be developing such a camera for release near the AE-1's 50th anniversary in 2026, blending classic aesthetics with up-to-date technology

Expected RE-1 Features

Classic AE-1 Inspired Design: Retro styling with dials for shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation, minimal grip bulge, and a film advance lever as a thumb grip, closely emulating the original AE-1 form factor.

Manual Controls: Physical dials for key settings and potentially a mode dial replaced with tactile controls, emphasizing an intuitive, hands-on user experience.

Full-frame 24MP Sensor: Likely to use Canon’s current non-stacked 24MP full-frame sensor (as found in the EOS R6 Mark II and R8), balancing image quality with affordability.

In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS): For steady shots with both vintage and modern lenses.

OLED Electronic Viewfinder: High-resolution EVF for a clean shooting interface without a rear screen clutter (some rumors even suggest minimalist, Leica-like controls via EVF or connected app, possibly limited rear display).

Advanced Autofocus & Connectivity: Latest Dual Pixel AF, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, and potentially app-based controls, making it practical for modern workflows and connected shooting.

Limited Video Features: Unlike hybrid models, focus is expected to be on photography rather than advanced video specs, keeping with the AE-1’s heritage as a stills camera.

RF Mount Compatibility: Full compatibility with Canon’s RF system, possibly bundled with RF manual-primes and even an FD-RF adapter for using vintage lenses.

Vari-angle Display (Rumored): Some sources mention a flexible rear display, though others suggest a minimal or fixed screen to maintain the throwback look.

Unique Options and VariantsSilver/Black Body Choices: Metal body available in classic finishes with weather sealing for durability.

Multiple Sensor Formats: There’s speculation about both full-frame and APS-C versions, appealing to different user bases.

Pricing and Positioning: Expected to be an enthusiast camera around $2000 USD, paralleling retro models from Nikon and Fujifilm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I'm looking for it too! I had never considered a Canon before (simply because it is too ugly) but I am now after the 45mm f1.2 coming out, but I do hope a beautiful compact body to be released sooner before I'm going with a R8 - the smallest canon FF body so far I could find.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I'm looking for it too! I had never considered a Canon before (simply because it is too ugly) but I am now after the 45mm f1.2 coming out, but I do hope a beautiful compact body to be released sooner before I'm going with a R8 - the smallest canon FF body so far I could find.
I actually spit my coffee up when I read "simply because it is too ugly". Unreal to me that someone would consider Canon cameras ugly and not buy a Canon because of the way it looks. Then again, there are people out there who still buy Pentax.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I actually spit my coffee up when I read "simply because it is too ugly". Unreal to me that someone would consider Canon cameras ugly and not buy a Canon because of the way it looks. Then again, there are people out there who still buy Pentax.
You’d better tighten your seatbelt when you read this post by Ivor Rackham, a “professional photographer and writer”. He is an Olympus ambassador.

See: https://fstoppers.com/gear/why-i-still-would-not-buy-canon-camera-661665?page=2
 
  • Wow
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Sorry, it is rather tedious to read. Earlier he wrote: “I have three reasons why you really shouldn’t buy a Canon: they are commonplace, boring, and ugly”.
See: https://fstoppers.com/opinion/why-i-wont-buy-canon-camera-556805
You don't need to apologize. My wife was binge watching "the witcher" until almost 1am the noisily gets ready for bed and now I can't sleep. It's actually not uncommon...

I think he's basically click bait.

he says artists sound themselves with things of beauty. That's not necessarily true for example Van Gogh is one of the most famous painters, but he was dependant on his brother's financial support and even so complained about hunger and illness. Beyond that beauty is a subjective opinion. I don't find the box like retro style any better worse than the modern organic shapes in esthetic appeal. He seems to admit most of his criticism is industry wide.
 
Upvote 0
I think he's basically click bait.
Indeed. His arguments are really poor.

Commonplace?
Yeah, okay, Canon is everywhere. Canon is the Costco of cameras - not fancy, not flashy, but somehow you always walk out with exactly what you needed. Meanwhile he's over there acting like owning a retro camera with horrible ergonomics makes him a photography prophet.

Boring?
Oh please. We're talking about cameras, not race cars. What does he want, flames down the side? Racing stripes? A spoiler? "Oooh, if only my camera screamed midlife crisis like a yellow convertible. If only people would notice me in the park, taking pictures of a dead bird next to an old can of Pabst and calling it art."

Ugly?
He's roasting cameras like they’re contestants on The Bachelor. “Canon, will you accept this rose? Oh wait, no, you’re too ugly.”
Newsflash: photographers care about images, not whether their camera could win Miss Photogenic 2025.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
Indeed. His arguments are really poor.

Commonplace?
Yeah, okay, Canon is everywhere. Canon is the Costco of cameras - not fancy, not flashy, but somehow you always walk out with exactly what you needed. Meanwhile he's over there acting like owning a retro camera with horrible ergonomics makes him a photography prophet.

Boring?
Oh please. We're talking about cameras, not race cars. What does he want, flames down the side? Racing stripes? A spoiler? "Oooh, if only my camera screamed midlife crisis like a yellow convertible. If only people would notice me in the park, taking pictures of a dead bird next to an old can of Pabst and calling it art."

Ugly?
He's roasting cameras like they’re contestants on The Bachelor. “Canon, will you accept this rose? Oh wait, no, you’re too ugly.”
Newsflash: photographers care about images, not whether their camera could win Miss Photogenic 2025.
Article is silly but both of you are projecting your personal preferences as stuff every photographer has to subscribe to.

I bought a silver top a7CII in large part because I wanted a camera body that looked good and was a little different, even if it meant sacrificing function for style. I would get an RE-1 or whatever it ends up being called over an R6 III for the same money for the same reasons. But I also won't say that everyone else needs to do the same.

Fstoppers is chock full of silly click bait and while I wont tell anyone else what to do it's not a place I personally see value in visiting.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I don't expect gear-heads to even vaguely understand what he is saying. Not that I agree with everything in the article at all, but when it comes to aesthetics, some people do care - and care very much. If you don't understand how modern society has lost something important when craftsmanship and artistic sensibilities are no longer a part of many of our products and everyday surroundings, well, then I guess the answer to make fun of, and ridicule someone who does.
 
Upvote 0
Y'all are probably unaware that Canon's design is based on concepts from the (back then) very famous designer Luigi Colani who also happened to design race cars, furniture, household items etc.
While those retro inspired cameras are just that: Boxes with rationalist 70s industrial design. Essentially, bricks with buttons.

So it's kinda ironic you think the latter one is the pinnacle of design when in reality, it's modern Canon cameras who are actually based on a real designer's craftsmanship.

Concept design for Canon:

15161.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Y'all are probably unaware that Canon's design is based on concepts from the (back then) very famous designer Luigi Colani who also happened to design race cars, furniture, household items etc.
While those retro inspired cameras are just that: Boxes with rationalist 70s industrial design. Essentially, bricks with buttons.

So it's kinda ironic you think the latter one is the pinnacle of design when in reality, it's modern Canon cameras who are actually based on a real designer's craftsmanship.

Concept design for Canon:

View attachment 227042
It's a good point. Little different from any other conservative vs liberal opinion. Either choice can be acceptable or unacceptable depending on one's frame of mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I can't find the link to comment on the rumored EOS RE-1 from the post today. It looks like it will be getting the R6 III sensor and less focus on video. I mainly do photography so this could be ideal for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0