• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

How many people think that their 5D Mark IV images are soft?

chauncey said:
the 5DS R is the king of resolution whereas the 5D IV has better acutance
I am truly puzzled when acutance is defined as "the sharpness of a photographic or printed image."
Is that not basically the same as king of resolution?

Acutance in simple terms refers to the edge sharpness of a transition from say dark to light. Resolution depends on distinguishing finely spaced details. Larger pixels in a lower resolution sensor give the illusion of a sharp transition and can make an image appear sharp whereas finely spaced small pixels in a high resolution sensor smooth out transitions. The finely spaced small pixels resolve small features better. In a similar fashion, downsizing makes images look sharper although at the same time losing resolution.
 
Upvote 0
AlanF said:
chauncey said:
the 5DS R is the king of resolution whereas the 5D IV has better acutance
I am truly puzzled when acutance is defined as "the sharpness of a photographic or printed image."
Is that not basically the same as king of resolution?

Acutance in simple terms refers to the edge sharpness of a transition from say dark to light. Resolution depends on distinguishing finely spaced details. Larger pixels in a lower resolution sensor give the illusion of a sharp transition and can make an image appear sharp whereas finely spaced small pixels in a high resolution sensor smooth out transitions. The finely spaced small pixels resolve small features better. In a similar fashion, downsizing makes images look sharper although at the same time losing resolution.

So you are talking about micro contrast by a different name then?
 
Upvote 0
GMCPhotographics said:
AlanF said:
chauncey said:
the 5DS R is the king of resolution whereas the 5D IV has better acutance
I am truly puzzled when acutance is defined as "the sharpness of a photographic or printed image."
Is that not basically the same as king of resolution?

Acutance in simple terms refers to the edge sharpness of a transition from say dark to light. Resolution depends on distinguishing finely spaced details. Larger pixels in a lower resolution sensor give the illusion of a sharp transition and can make an image appear sharp whereas finely spaced small pixels in a high resolution sensor smooth out transitions. The finely spaced small pixels resolve small features better. In a similar fashion, downsizing makes images look sharper although at the same time losing resolution.

So you are talking about micro contrast by a different name then?

Here's a really good site in general and in particular to this topic.

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/sharpness.htm

Jack
 
Upvote 0
cambridgeincolour. Cambridge = Cambridge, colour = British spelling. Therefore, it must be an excellent site. Joking apart, it really is a superb site for good explanations and for learning.
 
Upvote 0