How much better would the 5D mkIV have to be for you to upgrade from your mkiii?

What upgraded feature would push you to get the mkIV?

  • Double the battery life?

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • WIFI, Bluetooth, GPS, etc.

    Votes: 5 4.2%
  • 120 double cross type AF points???

    Votes: 4 3.4%
  • 2 stops of improved and usable ISO performance (low light capabilities).

    Votes: 78 66.1%
  • A 32 megapixel sensor and a 50mb RAW file.

    Votes: 30 25.4%

  • Total voters
    118
Status
Not open for further replies.
- swirl screen (its a low angle and a video tool gddamn it)

- higher dynamic range (thats critical)

- noiseless shadows when pushed up in post processing (way too critical, although ML does a GREAT job while canon genius firmware developers can't)

- faster AF in live view (its a shame for a $ 3000 equipment to have the same performance like 450D which was the first LV camera with AF (when shutter pressed) back in 2007)

- dual and FAST SD cards (get rid of this expensive stupid and outdated CF junk)

- wireless flash triggering would be nice (600D has one, and the pro series does not?)
 
Upvote 0
steliosk said:
- dual and FAST SD cards (get rid of this expensive stupid and outdated CF junk)

Allow me to politely disagree. If a 5D4 would come with SD card slots only, I would avoid it for that single reason, regardless of anything else.

But then again, I don't think I would be in the market for a 5D4 - I'm totally happy with my 5D3 :D
 
Upvote 0
Hmm...is there actually rumors of a 5D4 coming, so soon after the 5D3 release?

Me? Well, I think if they put native RAW video out via the HDMI or USB 3.0 or other output they come up with into an external recorder, that might sway me....

cayenne
 
Upvote 0
Two stops of ISO? I don't think that's theoretically possible. 1/2 stop of ISO is a big difference.
The difference between the original 5D and the 5D MK III is less than 1 stop. The original 5D is the lowest scoring Canon FF sensor (as far as high ISO is concerned) that DXO has measured.

Even the 1D X is a hair less than 1 stop better than the original 5D.
 
Upvote 0
Mt Spokane Photography said:
Two stops of ISO? I don't think that's theoretically possible. 1/2 stop of ISO is a big difference.
The difference between the original 5D and the 5D MK III is less than 1 stop. The original 5D is the lowest scoring Canon FF sensor (as far as high ISO is concerned) that DXO has measured.

Even the 1D X is a hair less than 1 stop better than the original 5D.

I believe what I meant was if the mkiii is usable at iso 6400, then the mkiv would be usable at 25600.
 
Upvote 0
For me it is all about high ISO image quality. I don't need more megapixels... (fewer would be ok even) Unless there is a dramatic improvement in High ISO image quality I would probably hold off on the IV (if there is one).

I still think the D3S is king when it comes to high ISO images. 1DX is really really close. This is the area I would like camera manufactures to continue to focus on.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.