How to Expose and get sharp Focus of Moon

fotoray

5D Mark III
Jul 20, 2010
198
0
I am taking the first shots with my new 100-400 II and decided to try it out on last night's full moon (1/6/2015).

I used my 7D +100-400 II mounted on a sturdy tripod. I shot against the dark sky at 400mm to get maximum image size (FF equivalent 640 mm).

Since moonlight is reflected sunlight, a typical daytime exposure ought to work fine. I shot in manual mode using 1/100 sec at f/11 and ISO 200. This exposure seemed OK, but maybe not optimum?

My trouble was in getting the focus right to get images with the sharpest possible detail.

I used manual focus in live view magnified 10x. I took each shot using the camera 10-sec self-timer and cable release to minimize camera shake.

I was disappointed in the lack of detail of my images. But maybe I had unrealistic expectations and have done about as good as can be expected within the limitations of my equipment - definitely no telescope available. :)

Still the attached uncropped image shows craters at 10 o'clock that I definitely cannot see from the ground!! So this is an improvement over my own eyesight!!

I'm looking for feedback from others who have taken shots of the moon using equipment similar to mine. Did you get better images than my attached sample. If so, what were your procedures?

Any feedback welcome and appreciated.

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Moon_100-400II_010615.jpg
    Moon_100-400II_010615.jpg
    162.8 KB · Views: 328
I'll leave a proper response to jrista and the other astro-experts here, but did you turn IS off? That will ruin a shot. Also, I'm not sure where you live, but here in Florida, the humidity, even in winter, is a sharpness killer. Atmospherics like humidity, pollution, and other air quality issues really affect astro shots in particular.
 
Upvote 0

fotoray

5D Mark III
Jul 20, 2010
198
0
mackguyver said:
I'll leave a proper response to jrista and the other astro-experts here, but did you turn IS off? That will ruin a shot. Also, I'm not sure where you live, but here in Florida, the humidity, even in winter, is a sharpness killer. Atmospherics like humidity, pollution, and other air quality issues really affect astro shots in particular.

Good input! I did NOT turn IS off, even though I know better. :( I'll try again tonight with what remains of the full moon.

Also, I live in LA, so air pollution is definitely a factor, something we can do nothing about, except take these types of pictures in clear air regions, if we can find them.

Thanks!
 
Upvote 0
Here's a shot with a 7D & 100-400 + a 1.4x
exposure 1/160th, f8, ISO 100
I use a robust tripod, remote release, and live view. My technique is to turn on the IS for easier focusing, then turn it off. Lock the lens to 400 to prevent zoom creep. I keep the Live View in 10x and watch for all the vibration to stop- this can take several seconds. Obviously, I cropped the photo quite a bit.

Moon 21 July 2013 © Keith breazeal by Keith Breazeal Photography, on Flickr

Here's one with a 5D III with a Celestron C-5. I used the exact same technique to shoot this one. The major difference is that I didn't need to do a massive crop.

Moon / Celestron C-5 Telescope / Canon 5D Mark III © Keith Breazeal by Keith Breazeal Photography, on Flickr
 
Upvote 0

fotoray

5D Mark III
Jul 20, 2010
198
0
KeithBreazeal said:
Here's a shot with a 7D & 100-400 + a 1.4x
exposure 1/160th, f8, ISO 100
I use a robust tripod, remote release, and live view. My technique is to turn on the IS for easier focusing, then turn it off. Lock the lens to 400 to prevent zoom creep. I keep the Live View in 10x and watch for all the vibration to stop- this can take several seconds. Obviously, I cropped the photo quite a bit.

Moon 21 July 2013 © Keith breazeal by Keith Breazeal Photography, on Flickr

Here's one with a 5D III with a Celestron C-5. I used the exact same technique to shoot this one. The major difference is that I didn't need to do a massive crop.

Moon / Celestron C-5 Telescope / Canon 5D Mark III © Keith Breazeal by Keith Breazeal Photography, on Flickr

What are the pixel dimensions and file format of your cropped image (Moon 21 July 2013)?
 
Upvote 0
fotoray said:
KeithBreazeal said:
Here's a shot with a 7D & 100-400 + a 1.4x
exposure 1/160th, f8, ISO 100
I use a robust tripod, remote release, and live view. My technique is to turn on the IS for easier focusing, then turn it off. Lock the lens to 400 to prevent zoom creep. I keep the Live View in 10x and watch for all the vibration to stop- this can take several seconds. Obviously, I cropped the photo quite a bit.

Moon 21 July 2013 © Keith breazeal by Keith Breazeal Photography, on Flickr

Here's one with a 5D III with a Celestron C-5. I used the exact same technique to shoot this one. The major difference is that I didn't need to do a massive crop.

Moon / Celestron C-5 Telescope / Canon 5D Mark III © Keith Breazeal by Keith Breazeal Photography, on Flickr

What are the pixel dimensions and file format of your cropped image (Moon 21 July 2013)?

If I want to take the time, I'll import the raw file to Lightroom and make a few exposure adjusts. I save it as a tiff. I'll crop and re-size the tiff to 5000 at 300 dpi. I make any sharpening adjustments now. Jpeg is saved at 5000 and 300dpi and loaded to Flicker.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 9, 2012
861
295
fotoray said:
Good input! I did NOT turn IS off, even though I know better. :( I'll try again tonight with what remains of the full moon.

Thanks!

I'm not an astro-shooter, either, but not having a full moon might actually help your quest for sharpness and detail. You won't get a perfectly round moon, but you'll get shadows on the craters near the waning edge that will increase the contrast of the details. Just a thought...
 
Upvote 0
mackguyver said:
I'll leave a proper response to jrista and the other astro-experts here, but did you turn IS off? That will ruin a shot.
No, IS will ruin shots with long exposures (more than one second), but not for short exposures like this.

fotoray said:
Since moonlight is reflected sunlight, a typical daytime exposure ought to work fine. I shot in manual mode using 1/100 sec at f/11 and ISO 200.
Good argument regarding daylight settings! Though you should get better results by opening up the aperture and using shorter exposures and base ISO. Focal depth is really not an issue, vibrations much more so (though perhaps not in your case, using IS). F/11 actually gives less sharp images than f/8, due to refraction. I don't know what the optimal opening for the 7D is, but I'm guessing somewhere between f/5.6 and f/8.

I find focusing on the moon using live view comparatively easy. Just try to find as close an optimum focus as you can, and don't forget to switch off AF.

A good thing to know is that the moon shows less detail the closer to full moon you are. Half moon is optimal, and that is because the shadows cast by structures on the moon at the terminator are at their longest and most easily visible. Look at KeithBreazeal's great moon shots above, they also shows most of their detail close to the terminator (the border between day and night). I see Famateur made the same observation.
 
Upvote 0
Famateur said:
fotoray said:
Good input! I did NOT turn IS off, even though I know better. :( I'll try again tonight with what remains of the full moon.

Thanks!

I'm not an astro-shooter, either, but not having a full moon might actually help your quest for sharpness and detail. You won't get a perfectly round moon, but you'll get shadows on the craters near the waning edge that will increase the contrast of the details. Just a thought...
Yes, a good suggestion, this gives better detail of the craters, as they cast a shadow.

I've used the 300mm f4 + 1.4x TC on a 5D3 for moon shots. I simply use autofocus, as it's big enough to obtain focus + mirror lockup.
 
Upvote 0
Try to have something in the foreground to accent the size and perspective. Sometimes you can get a good enough moon rise(low atmospheric distortions from wind and heat shimmer) that will allow for a major crop. This is something I did a while back and required a lot of work to bring out the snow. Note uncropped frame at the upper left. A day before or after the actual full moon is the best for getting some detail(some shadows) when trying for the full moon look. A true full moon by itself in the sky makes it look like a low contrast Black & White pizza in a dark room.

Super Moon editing before & after © Keith Breazeal by Keith Breazeal Photography, on Flickr
 
Upvote 0
KeithBreazeal said:
Try to have something in the foreground to accent the size and perspective. Sometimes you can get a good enough moon rise(low atmospheric distortions from wind and heat shimmer) that will allow for a major crop. This is something I did a while back and required a lot of work to bring out the snow. Note uncropped frame at the upper left. A day before or after the actual full moon is the best for getting some detail(some shadows) when trying for the full moon look. A true full moon by itself in the sky makes it look like a low contrast Black & White pizza in a dark room.

Super Moon editing before & after © Keith Breazeal by Keith Breazeal Photography, on Flickr
[/quote

pretty cool shot Keith(and advice)...let's see the final result.
 
Upvote 0

fotoray

5D Mark III
Jul 20, 2010
198
0
I shot again last night while applying some of the suggestions provided here. Results were greatly improved, with much better focus and sharpness with IS turned off. There was some blurring during focus from the atmosphere, so clearer air may have helped improve this result.

Using 7D +100-400 II at 400mm and manual exposure my settings were 1/100 sec, f/8, ISO 100. Used liveview at 10x and manual focus with cable release and 2-sec timer. Liveview automatically locks up the mirror, so it is eliminated as a source of vibration.

The attached image has been cropped to 1024 x 1024 at 300 dpi. The result isn't as exciting as Keith's, but much better than what I got the previous night.

More practice will improve my results further. Now I at least have a good procedure to start with.

Thanks to everyone for your helpful suggestions! Any comments or suggestions?
 

Attachments

  • Moon_010715.jpg
    Moon_010715.jpg
    435.2 KB · Views: 199
Upvote 0
Northstar said:
KeithBreazeal said:
Try to have something in the foreground to accent the size and perspective. Sometimes you can get a good enough moon rise(low atmospheric distortions from wind and heat shimmer) that will allow for a major crop. This is something I did a while back and required a lot of work to bring out the snow. Note uncropped frame at the upper left. A day before or after the actual full moon is the best for getting some detail(some shadows) when trying for the full moon look. A true full moon by itself in the sky makes it look like a low contrast Black & White pizza in a dark room.

Super Moon editing before & after © Keith Breazeal by Keith Breazeal Photography, on Flickr
[/quote

pretty cool shot Keith(and advice)...let's see the final result.

Here you go...

Moon Rise over the snowy Sierras © Keith Breazeal by Keith Breazeal Photography, on Flickr
 
Upvote 0
MAny good tips here which I think you have tried and found great results. After you master good focus and reduced image shake, you can also use your camera histogram to help as well. Expose the image so that the moon is on the right side of the histogram. 4th or 5th division but not all the way to the edge. In live view it will look overexposed but that's ok. You can pull it down in Photoshop, DPP or other image editing tool.

There are a couple of reasons for doing this. The first is that pulling down the exposure will greatly assist in reducing noise. Even at ISO 100 there is noise and this allows you to reduce it even further. It's a good method to use even taking other normal photographs. It Allows you to apply more sharpness to compensate for atmospheric loss. The other reason is a DSLR records more shades of grey or color at the bright end of the histogram. Lots of math goes into explaining that but you can use that to your favor to record the subtle variations in surface brightness better.

Also as you found out ISO 100 is generally the best when you are trying to record highlight detail. Higher ISO is used to record better shadow detail. The higher the ISO used the less highlight detail your camera will record. For the moon use ISO 100 as its all highlight.
 
Upvote 0
Congratulations, it looks like a real improvement!

fotoray said:
There was some blurring during focus from the atmosphere, so clearer air may have helped improve this result.
If you are aiming for as much detail as possible of the moon (without foreground objects), it is generally best to shoot when the moon is as high as possible in the sky, since that reduces the air column towards it, and hence "seeing" (blurring) effects from the atmosphere. Also, avoid setting your equipment up close to a heat source (like an open window, line of sight closely over roof/chimney or warm car) as the heat generates blurring air turbulence.

Using 7D +100-400 II at 400mm and manual exposure my settings were 1/100 sec, f/8, ISO 100. Used liveview at 10x and manual focus with cable release and 2-sec timer.
If you haven't already, you can gain some experience by varying your settings, taking a series of images for each setting. For instance, try using the lens wide open and go down in exposure time, try with IS on/off, and so on. The degree of image blurring due to atmosphere can be episodic, so try during different times of the night.
 
Upvote 0
KeithBreazeal said:
Northstar said:
KeithBreazeal said:
Try to have something in the foreground to accent the size and perspective. Sometimes you can get a good enough moon rise(low atmospheric distortions from wind and heat shimmer) that will allow for a major crop. This is something I did a while back and required a lot of work to bring out the snow. Note uncropped frame at the upper left. A day before or after the actual full moon is the best for getting some detail(some shadows) when trying for the full moon look. A true full moon by itself in the sky makes it look like a low contrast Black & White pizza in a dark room.

Super Moon editing before & after © Keith Breazeal by Keith Breazeal Photography, on Flickr
[/quote

pretty cool shot Keith(and advice)...let's see the final result.

Here you go...

Moon Rise over the snowy Sierras © Keith Breazeal by Keith Breazeal Photography, on Flickr

Beautiful shot Keith!
 
Upvote 0