Upvote
0
It seems that a few people desperately want such a camera. That doesn't mean that Canon desperately needs to make one.1. Canon desperately needs a better prosumer grade APS-C. The R7 isn't it. So maybe an R7 Mark II.
That´s what I mentioned a couple of weeks ago. The discontinuation of the BG-E10 could mean the R6mkiii we´ll get sooner than later if they once again share the BG.Am I right in thinking Canon have discontinued battery grip for R5 & R6II ?
If so an R6III makes sense.
I went exactly the other way: IBIS, LP-E6NH battery life, better built, option of real battery grip, only slightly bigger. I went the R6m2 route.The idea of an R6 III is intriguing. ... Yes, there are compromises in the R8 compared to the R6II, but these are not important enough, even the lack of IBIS as all my main RF lenses have IS. As such, I wouldn't be surprised if the R8 actually takes away significant sales from the R6II as potential R6II buyers opt for the cheaper option especially when it is 'only' 24mp. ...
Am I right in thinking Canon have discontinued battery grip for R5 & R6II ?
If so an R6III makes sense.
Wasn't there an information/guess that the BG-E10 should be (backward) compatible to both R5 and R6m2?That´s what I mentioned a couple of weeks ago. The discontinuation of the BG-E10 could mean the R6mkiii we´ll get sooner than later if they once again share the BG.
IF they share a BG again, I´d hope both cameras as well as the BG will have a smart controlle
You are insulting Canon Rumors now, you know? They had major specs long time before the first teaser from Canon.Canon made a number of comments about the R5 between announcement and release. They weren’t leaks as far as I remember. Confirmation about the 8k raw video specs were the main updates… not Timelapse, with full AF etc
I'm not using WIFI, so I don't care.But WiFi 5 only? Not really, don't you think?
It was discussed in the other thread/article, that a higher value camera would/should get WiFi 6, so WiFi 5 was pointing towards cheaper cam.I'm not using WIFI, so I don't care.
...
R3 II with 30 MP and improved AF? The perfect camera.
Too good to be true!
I suppose, you need to check your ISO menu of your R6m2.… that the R6ii suffers from and also bring back iso5000, instead of just having 3200 and 6400.
Now I got the message!It was discussed in the other thread/article, that a higher value camera would/should get WiFi 6, so WiFi 5 was pointing towards cheaper cam.
It seems that a few people desperately want such a camera. That doesn't mean that Canon desperately needs to make one.
So, when I switch my R5 to APS-C mode all my lenses get longer? Do they also get longer if I crop to APS-C in post?"The crop factor of an APS-C sensor makes smaller or more distant subjects larger in the frame, which in effect increases the effective focal length of any lens by 1.6x. This can be a major advantage in genres such as wildlife, action and sports photography. "
That's direct from Canon. The original 1Dd clear through the 1DIV were 1.3 crop sensors. Not full frame.