Is Canon Robbing Fuji on All They Got???

[-1]

Is dual pixel raw feature a revamped Fujifilm "Super CCD SR II sensor" from the S3 Pro? HDR in the RAW then!!!

http://www.danlj.org/%7Edanlj/photos/technique/fujiS3/ccd.jpg

Article:

http://www.danlj.org/%7Edanlj/photos/technique/fujiS3/index.html

 

[Ozarker]

No. Canon's Dual Pixel Auto Focus (DPAF) has nothing to do with dynamic range. It is for live view focusing.

 

[-1]

No. Canon's Dual Pixel Auto Focus (DPAF) has nothing to do with dynamic range. It is for live view focusing.

I don't think that Dual Pixel RAW and DPAF is the the same thing. If so then it would have been called that.

 

[Ozarker]

No. Canon's Dual Pixel Auto Focus (DPAF) has nothing to do with dynamic range. It is for live view focusing.

I don't think that Dual Pixel RAW and DPAF is the the same thing. If so then it would have been called that.

Maybe so. Could be both! That would be nice.

 

[Sharlin]

No. Canon's Dual Pixel Auto Focus (DPAF) has nothing to do with dynamic range. It is for live view focusing.

I don't think that Dual Pixel RAW and DPAF is the the same thing. If so then it would have been called that.

Maybe so. Could be both! That would be nice.

The 5D4 has DPAF, that is a given. The latest information on the new DP RAW feature is that the parallax info from the DPAF dual photosites is saved so focus tricks are possible in post-processing.

 

[Mt Spokane Photography]

The DP RAW feature man only be usable in Canon DPP, so if you want to use a different image processor, it may be a long wait. It depends on Canon sharing information, or a lot of reverse engineering.

It might be to Canon's benefit to share information, but they sometimes don't see it that way.

 

[tron]

Now that the functionality has been leaked it is obvious that in Canon DP is something completely different. End of story! Having said that it would be nice for Canon to share information for use by different image processors.

 

[YuengLinger]

Thread title is obnoxious.