For timelapses. Discuss. Does it depend on how far apart your intervals are so the camera has enough buffer time, etc?
paul13walnut5 said:I use JPEG for timelapse.
Life is too short.
You can also do the same with jpg. Lightroom will let you edit one and then synch to a string. Jpg might be better merely because of the smaller file size, a card can fill up pretty fast.Jesse said:I'm shooting on a 5D3.
I get that for a timelapse eventually the footage will be 1080p, which is way lower quality than jpg. I guess a better question would be, is it worth it to shoot in RAW, then edit the photos (edit one and apply to the rest) and then convert to jpg?
jpg vs. RAW
cayenne said:Is there a rule of thumb about how many frames per second you want to be shooting?
On a 60D, you can shoot at 5.9 frames per second forever if you are saving as jpeg with a fast memory card. better cameras shold be more, worse cameras less.Jesse said:For timelapses. Discuss. Does it depend on how far apart your intervals are so the camera has enough buffer time, etc?