Some images from Italy (Central Alps and Rome) taken with the new king of wides 
at least in terms of field of view.
Some of the images are single shots, some are panoramas. It is funny how, no matter how wide a lens I have, sooner or later I find myself wanting wider for some shot
A few considerations:
at least in terms of field of view.Some of the images are single shots, some are panoramas. It is funny how, no matter how wide a lens I have, sooner or later I find myself wanting wider for some shot
A few considerations:
- Loved size and weight: it's no effort to carry around and even my 10yo daughter was comfortable holding it on the R5+battery grip
- added bonus: she found it funny and wanted to take photos of us and me to take photos of her, which is an increasingly rare occurrence nowadays
- It's well built and does not feel cheap
- Not a huge fan of the lens cap - it takes a while to mount sometimes
- The lens is sharp and cannot fault its image quality
- I guess, as photographer, 10mm is fun but, ultimately, too wide in most circumstances - difficult to achieve a good composition without too many unwanted elements in
- 20mm is a much more versatile fl, especially if people are involved
- Panoramas are doable at 20mm but at 10mm you get in iffy land... too much distortion
Last edited:
