sooooo you guys have actually got IQ180 phaseones and D800s that you are personally testing against?
Upvote
0
sooooo you guys have actually got IQ180 phaseones and D800s that you are personally testing against?
unfocused said:3) Single-digit fetishists who can't stand the thought that Canon would actually use a single digit to market an APS-C camera.
sarangiman said:sooooo you guys have actually got IQ180 phaseones and D800s that you are personally testing against?
Nope, and therefore I'm choosing to reserve judgement.
I think you may have missed the entire point of my post
I find the dynamic range arguement laughable since the entire basis is in a range of HEAVILY Pushed shadows anyway
My main point is that these differences are tiny but being presented as epic
wickidwombat said:Sorry I wasn't pointing to you as a troll, I was more trying to point out that I'm not anti Nikon
I understand the sensor read noise issues and agree more could be done to reduce this
I find exposing to the right and pulling down highlights works pretty well to be honest
I just feel it is not as big a deal as it is being made out to be which causes a follow on effect of
misinformation being repeated as fact
briansquibb said:wickidwombat said:Sorry I wasn't pointing to you as a troll, I was more trying to point out that I'm not anti Nikon
I understand the sensor read noise issues and agree more could be done to reduce this
I find exposing to the right and pulling down highlights works pretty well to be honest
I just feel it is not as big a deal as it is being made out to be which causes a follow on effect of
misinformation being repeated as fact
I expose to the right and keep the iso down to 400 or less. Noise is not an issue to me (mostly because I dont get visible noise) - in fact I often add grain in pp
wickidwombat said:briansquibb said:wickidwombat said:Sorry I wasn't pointing to you as a troll, I was more trying to point out that I'm not anti Nikon
I understand the sensor read noise issues and agree more could be done to reduce this
I find exposing to the right and pulling down highlights works pretty well to be honest
I just feel it is not as big a deal as it is being made out to be which causes a follow on effect of
misinformation being repeated as fact
I expose to the right and keep the iso down to 400 or less. Noise is not an issue to me (mostly because I dont get visible noise) - in fact I often add grain in pp
looks like it was shot on a 5Dmk3 at iso 51200
I find exposing to the right and pulling down highlights works pretty well to be honest I just feel it is not as big a deal as it is being made out to be which causes a follow on effect of misinformation being repeated as fact
wickidwombat said:I find exposing to the right and pulling down highlights works pretty well to be honest
Albi86 said:Also, as this causes to halven the shutter speed, it's not an option when using a tele.
briansquibb said:Albi86 said:Also, as this causes to halven the shutter speed, it's not an option when using a tele.
Not sure why it isn't an option with a tele?
Albi86 said:briansquibb said:Albi86 said:Also, as this causes to halven the shutter speed, it's not an option when using a tele.
Not sure why it isn't an option with a tele?
Eeerrr... in order to get sharp images?
Unless you're using a tripod or can arrange a very comfortable shot otherwise.
briansquibb said:Albi86 said:briansquibb said:Albi86 said:Also, as this causes to halven the shutter speed, it's not an option when using a tele.
Not sure why it isn't an option with a tele?
Eeerrr... in order to get sharp images?
Unless you're using a tripod or can arrange a very comfortable shot otherwise.
Ah - you mean at low shutter speed?
Albi86 said:briansquibb said:Albi86 said:briansquibb said:Albi86 said:Also, as this causes to halven the shutter speed, it's not an option when using a tele.
Not sure why it isn't an option with a tele?
Eeerrr... in order to get sharp images?
Unless you're using a tripod or can arrange a very comfortable shot otherwise.
Ah - you mean at low shutter speed?
Depends on how low is low for you
Honestly, when shooting at - let's say - 300mm, I consider 1/800s to be the threshold for APS-C and 1/500s for FF.
Stabilization and individual steadyness can do a lot about it, but I never trust them too much.
Albi86 said:Honestly, when shooting at - let's say - 300mm, I consider 1/800s to be the threshold for APS-C and 1/500s for FF. Stabilization and individual steadyness can do a lot about it, but I never trust them too much.
wickidwombat said:why dont all the Noink DR fanboys take their D800s over to nikon rumours and have a nice circle jerk over them there instead of constantly plaguing a forum about canon