I do see a building the left.neuroanatomist said:dolina said:ISO 3m is useful for photojournalist or paparazzi who can take photos of say Angelina Jolie kissing someone other than Brad Pitt.boozed said:But at least it'll be a very short time.stoneysnapper said:ISO 3m will be a waste of time
The photo's image quality may be ignored by people on CR but a lot of news outlets would pay 10x the value of the D5 for exclusive rights to the image.
There's Angelina kissing Rob on a rooftop, do you see?
![]()
A limitation of licensing, technical or restriction imposed by the organizer of said events the D5 will be used at.preppyak said:Kind of blows my mind that Nikon can only deliver 4k for 3mins on the D5 when Sony solved it in a much smaller camera body and so did Panasonic. And when Canon solved it 4 years ago as well.
dolina said:A limitation of licensing, technical or restriction imposed by the organizer of said events the D5 will be used at.preppyak said:Kind of blows my mind that Nikon can only deliver 4k for 3mins on the D5 when Sony solved it in a much smaller camera body and so did Panasonic. And when Canon solved it 4 years ago as well.
Timeline may be a reason as well assuming they're rushing development of the D5.
4K resolution video for more than 3 mins could be enabled by a simple firmware update in the future.
agreed!neuroanatomist said:dolina said:A limitation of licensing, technical or restriction imposed by the organizer of said events the D5 will be used at.preppyak said:Kind of blows my mind that Nikon can only deliver 4k for 3mins on the D5 when Sony solved it in a much smaller camera body and so did Panasonic. And when Canon solved it 4 years ago as well.
Timeline may be a reason as well assuming they're rushing development of the D5.
4K resolution video for more than 3 mins could be enabled by a simple firmware update in the future.
Or the problem is heat.
Any which way we look at it the D5 is the baseline Canon should aspire to surpass.neuroanatomist said:dolina said:A limitation of licensing, technical or restriction imposed by the organizer of said events the D5 will be used at.preppyak said:Kind of blows my mind that Nikon can only deliver 4k for 3mins on the D5 when Sony solved it in a much smaller camera body and so did Panasonic. And when Canon solved it 4 years ago as well.
Timeline may be a reason as well assuming they're rushing development of the D5.
4K resolution video for more than 3 mins could be enabled by a simple firmware update in the future.
Or the problem is heat.
dolina said:Any which way we look at it the D5 is the baseline Canon should aspire to surpass.neuroanatomist said:dolina said:A limitation of licensing, technical or restriction imposed by the organizer of said events the D5 will be used at.preppyak said:Kind of blows my mind that Nikon can only deliver 4k for 3mins on the D5 when Sony solved it in a much smaller camera body and so did Panasonic. And when Canon solved it 4 years ago as well.
Timeline may be a reason as well assuming they're rushing development of the D5.
4K resolution video for more than 3 mins could be enabled by a simple firmware update in the future.
Or the problem is heat.
At a price point of $12,000 in 2012. Price dropped to $8,000 in 2015.neuroanatomist said:In the case of 4K recording, Canon surpassed the D5 four years ago with the 1D C.
PureClassA said:Umm yeah. Let's be honest. The D5 so far doesn't seem like too hard of a threshold to leap beyond...
dolina said:At a price point of $12,000 in 2012. Price dropped to $8,000 in 2015.neuroanatomist said:In the case of 4K recording, Canon surpassed the D5 four years ago with the 1D C.
D5 is $6,500 in 2016.
neuroanatomist said:dolina said:At a price point of $12,000 in 2012. Price dropped to $8,000 in 2015.neuroanatomist said:In the case of 4K recording, Canon surpassed the D5 four years ago with the 1D C.
D5 is $6,500 in 2016.
The 1D C is a mere $500 more at this point. If I was planning to shoot 4K video on a top-shelf dSLR, that $500 would be more than worth it to overcome the D5's limit of capturing 3 min of 4K video.
Those reasons would seem to ring hollow once you read the EOSHD article. I cant honestly find a reason anyone would willingly shoot video on a Nikon D5. It does 4k, for 3mins, at a crop mode...despite every Sony model doing better, and despite a speedbooster making something like a GH4, (at 1/3rd the price), a far more practical option.dolina said:A limitation of licensing, technical or restriction imposed by the organizer of said events the D5 will be used at.preppyak said:Kind of blows my mind that Nikon can only deliver 4k for 3mins on the D5 when Sony solved it in a much smaller camera body and so did Panasonic. And when Canon solved it 4 years ago as well.
Timeline may be a reason as well assuming they're rushing development of the D5.
4K resolution video for more than 3 mins could be enabled by a simple firmware update in the future.
This is definitely true. And as someone who will probably stick with Canon for the stills side of things, I'm going for the $99 Fotodiox adapters to work those lenses into the Sony/Panasonic video environments. Though Metabones makes nice enough adapters that they are worth the price.PureClassA said:The only reason guys like Metabones are in business are because everyone wants Canon glass on their Alpha 7s for video lol.