Damn straight. Even budget models come with two b.....Yep canon and god didnt made mistake ,second heart and card is for premium bodys like angels and pro models
Upvote
0
Damn straight. Even budget models come with two b.....Yep canon and god didnt made mistake ,second heart and card is for premium bodys like angels and pro models
LOL. If you prick your finger on a rose thorn, that’s a hemorrhage? The term hemorrhaging means copious, severe bleeding. You might want to look that one up. One person you know has swapped to Sony? OMG, Canon is doomed!!I never said that Canon wasn't doing well. The term hemorrhaging means bleeding. There is no disputing Sony has become a big player. I am buying a used 1DX mkII shortly from someone going over to Sony. One of my shooting partners has swapped to Sony. They have serious momentum and some damn good cameras and represent stiff competition.
How come this can be interpreted has...."normal" or without surprise? Canon is 3 years behind! They have answered to a change in the market in a terrible slower way! In the same way How come the lenses can serve as an excuse?? No way!! RF adapters and the existing lenses can give Canon the confidence to launch a Pro body! If they don´t launch it is because they don´t have it!
I don´t believe i am saying this.....but i see the good bye Canon, closer and closer....
I am guessing that some major component of the “pro” R has been delayed in its development. Could be the new sensor, or improved EVF, or faster processor. Production problems often cause schedules to slip.I'm surprised. The High MP camera is not the one I want next. I'm waiting for a 5D IV replacement which seems now to be a long way off.
I'm still not sure why Canon is pushing pro lens without a pro camera.
The RP will sell well but it seems a camera to me that requires some cheaper lens.
Maybe by hinting at no more new cameras in 2019 they are trying to encourage sales of the existing mirrorless cameras.
I wonder is Canon haven't difficulty designing a more advanced mirrorless camera.
Because the overall camera market is contracting!when canon is doing so well why they lay of staff in america and some european countrys?
staff from the camera division.....
Absolutely NOT. There are too many options available. Doesn't make sense for Canon to bypass wedding season for 2020 and release only pro level lenses without a pro body, placing there bets on a camera days before the Tokyo Olympics. My bet would be that Canon as usual is holding it's cards until this summer.
I hope you are out and on your feet soon, and we get to enjoy your posts for many years to come.As a guy sitting in cardiac unit following a procedure.... yeah, I'm complaining we have but one heart.
So, what features are missing in current cameras that:
a) make an actual measurable difference in image quality
b) make an actual measurable difference in what images are practical to capture
c) both fall in either of the above categories AND require the absence of a mirror box
I know of only one feature that would arguably fall in category c: no more cropped bokeh balls. That's solved by removing the mechanical obstruction that is the mirror box. That's already solved by both the R series bodies, right? What's next?
Ibis? You can combine that with a mirror.
Eye AF? That too.
Floppy flippy screen? Come on!
Lightweight body? Have you seen the 6D?
Exposure preview, focus peaking or zebra stripes in viewfinder? Just make the (now 300k pixel) light meter slightly higher resolution and add an oled display in the ovf stack where there are already LEDs.
The slapping mirror makes an astonishing small impact on the overall system once you really start to think about it.
The R is fantastically capable and I don't see a huge amount that can be improved for still photog (other than making it bigger, heavier, but sturdier and more ergonomic, and of course IBIS).
No more AFMA is not true. https://www.canonrumors.com/forum/i...afma-for-nikon-z6-z7-mirrorless-coming.36892/Just to name a few:
... and thats just a few.
- No More AMFA (Just that is worth the price of admission)
- Liveview in EVF (Does wonders in low light situations, you see you subject)
- Focus Peaking
- High burst rate even in Quiet Shutter Settings
- Quieter Shutter Operations
Back home and feeling great! Atrial flutter (different from afib). Had the ablation procedure yesterday and went home this morning. Had a very elevated heart rate for about 8 months, 145 bpm, but not pounding. Almost unnoticeable. Decided to have it checked a week ago. They got me right in at Baylor's new heart hospital in Plano. My wife has a bad valve, so if we hadn't been regularly checking hers, we'd have never noticed mine. I got lucky.I hope you are out and on your feet soon, and we get to enjoy your posts for many years to come.
(((())))
Bad news for Canon, excellent news for you!Back home and feeling great! Atrial flutter (different from afib). Had the ablation procedure yesterday and went home this morning. Had a very elevated heart rate for about 8 months, 145 bpm, but not pounding. Almost unnoticeable. Decided to have it checked a week ago. They got me right in at Baylor's new heart hospital in Plano. My wife has a bad valve, so if we hadn't been regularly checking hers, we'd have never noticed mine. I got lucky.
I've not got a bill yet... but it is probably safe to say there won't be any new gear the rest of the next year or two.
145! WOW! I can only hit that when pushing way too hard on the bike! I can’t imagine living with that!Back home and feeling great! Atrial flutter (different from afib). Had the ablation procedure yesterday and went home this morning. Had a very elevated heart rate for about 8 months, 145 bpm, but not pounding. Almost unnoticeable. Decided to have it checked a week ago. They got me right in at Baylor's new heart hospital in Plano. My wife has a bad valve, so if we hadn't been regularly checking hers, we'd have never noticed mine. I got lucky.
I've not got a bill yet... but it is probably safe to say there won't be any new gear the rest of the next year or two.
Canon isn't 3 years behind. Maybe some years late to market, but that's it.How come this can be interpreted has...."normal" or without surprise? Canon is 3 years behind! They have answered to a change in the market in a terrible slower way! In the same way How come the lenses can serve as an excuse?? No way!! RF adapters and the existing lenses can give Canon the confidence to launch a Pro body! If they don´t launch it is because they don´t have it!
I don´t believe i am saying this.....but i see the good bye Canon, closer and closer....
I always read "N..ew Body in 2019" skipping some characters ... after 25 years of internet usage my reading capabilities are a little bit damaged ... or it's just wishing for a new release that is exactly for me
Maybe Canon is thinking about and working on a strategy which fulfills two classes or FF users: Those who want the maximum resolution / IQ for landscape and studio and on the other hand those who need a very fast camera with very fast and reliable AF for sports / animals (the fast moving ones) / action.
Putting these features in ONE body seems impossible to me at least at a reasonable price below 20 000 EUR / $ .
A solution might be to introduce both flavours of a pro model at the same time knowing that selling pros some lemons will damage Canon with some long term effect - IMO this is the reason for the sequence
M50: look what above average non pro users say, launch the EOS R for the mid range between advanced amateurs and pros, than check what is possible in the cheapo FF sector. Set a foot into the FF mirrorless land and increase the attractivity of the system by putting a very interesting bunch of lenses into the market (compact 2.8 70 200 is ingenious). The lenses can shine with EOS R and EOS RP and make a lot of people lusting for a body, delaying decisions to leave the (Canon) boat, giving the company more time to make a successful first step into the FF mirrorless market.
I'm presently planning a trip to Japan, and I could never even imagine using a camera with a single card-slot.Backing up frequently doesn't replace lost shots when a card fails. BTW: There are no professional cameras. There are professional photographers. I am no professional photographer when it comes to making a living at it. However, when I shoot an important event I try to be professional in action and demeanor. At those events I have set the standard for myself to shoot RAW to two cards at the same time. Why? Because some moments/shots cannot be redone. If one is willing to sign a contract to deliver a product, one better darn well be able to deliver. I suspect you don't own the 5D Mark IV nor the R. Your saying the R makes the Mark IV obsolete belies a gross unfamiliarity with one or both cameras. I volunteer shoot for a big fashion charity. Models, designers, MUAH, etc. all pay for their photos. Proceeds go to the charity work. All of it. If a card fails on me I could lose dozens of shots that cannot be duplicated. Huge time constraints. Those people will have sometimes traveled halfway around the world and paid good money to the charity. They'd have to be refunded. I'd then have a reputation as unreliable. So would the charity. Different story if I'm shooting portraits at the park. I've studied at getting an RP myself, but as an extreme emergency backup to my dual slot camera. Probably will go 5D IV or V instead... unless a dual slot R gets released. Even then, to be able to use RF lenses, not because the 5 series is obsolete.