I'm a little hesitant to make a Neuro comment but I feel compelled. Recently, I commented that I'd sure love the permanently lit focus point of the 1D IV, in the 1DX II. Neuro explained how it wasn't likely to happen and gave a plausible reason. I kept my hopes up and when it
did happen I did not make any snide remarks (that's not my style). Neuro's response was fine.
He has been very helpful to me in other regards and I appreciate his knowledge. He sometimes is a little harsh in correcting comments from what appear to be "know it alls" spouting "nonsense" or the "doom and gloom demise of Canon". Personally, I'd just ignore the dodo birds, but that's me.
And Dilbert, well I'd feel sorry for Dilbert, but he willingly plays the game and seems to take the buffeting well and after a couple years of viewing Dilbert comments I just smile and ignore what is pure nonsense and appreciate the odd bit of valid commentary. And finally, Neuro is sometimes wrong and reluctant to admit it like many of us. Shape up Neuro!
I tend to keep quiet when there is a good chance I'd be wrong, preferring to just soak up all the knowledge that many have to contribute, and once in a while adding my 2 cents worth. I don't understand the compulsion that folk have in defending any manufacturer but I also have trouble keeping quiet when some high profile individual produces a video that is clearly deceptive and blatantly biased. Pro-Canon Ken and pro-Nikon whomever, bug me equally.
I read CR for the humour. Twisted humour; perhaps.
Jack