Hi all,
I have a theoretical question, with a hypothetical practical outcome.
Is a 5DII + 24-105F4L IS an adequate replacement for a 7D + 17-55F2.8 IS? Mainly in terms of concert shooting and therefore lighting, not FPS et al. I ask, because I have read about full frame cameras being able to 'catch more light', as it were. Would the first combination result in more light, thus requiring a lower iso?
Thanks in advance,
janne
Edit: added equivalent to the title, which might be confusing.
I have a theoretical question, with a hypothetical practical outcome.
Is a 5DII + 24-105F4L IS an adequate replacement for a 7D + 17-55F2.8 IS? Mainly in terms of concert shooting and therefore lighting, not FPS et al. I ask, because I have read about full frame cameras being able to 'catch more light', as it were. Would the first combination result in more light, thus requiring a lower iso?
Thanks in advance,
janne
Edit: added equivalent to the title, which might be confusing.