mackguyver said:Good news for DxO users - they will have the profile for what looks like all or nearly all Canon bodies next month:
I haven't figured out a pattern with them, but it's usually with the new ACR releases. It could be in the next one somewhere around August/September. For my architectural work the distortion correction from profiles is a huge timesaveremko said:mackguyver said:Good news for DxO users - they will have the profile for what looks like all or nearly all Canon bodies next month:
oh yea i forgot about that anyone know how long ACR takes to get new lens profiles?
mackguyver said:I haven't figured out a pattern with them, but it's usually with the new ACR releases. It could be in the next one somewhere around August/September. For my architectural work the distortion correction from profiles is a huge timesaveremko said:mackguyver said:Good news for DxO users - they will have the profile for what looks like all or nearly all Canon bodies next month:
oh yea i forgot about that anyone know how long ACR takes to get new lens profiles?![]()
RLPhoto said:IQ and IR test of the new 16-35mm f/4.
Canon EF 16-35 F4 L IS First Impressions & IQ/IR …
I remember they had really detailed instructions about this when they first released it, but I never got around to trying it. Have you made some? If so, I'm guessing the results are pretty good given that it's a profile of your own lens+camera combination.privatebydesign said:It isn't difficult or that time consuming to make your own with the free Adobe Lens Profile Creator.
mackguyver said:I remember they had really detailed instructions about this when they first released it, but I never got around to trying it. Have you made some? If so, I'm guessing the results are pretty good given that it's a profile of your own lens+camera combination.privatebydesign said:It isn't difficult or that time consuming to make your own with the free Adobe Lens Profile Creator.
For my commercial work - mostly building interiors - where I have used the 16-35 f/2.8 II and plan to use this lens, having perfectly straight lines is really important and having profiles saves a lot of time. The manual distortion tools work, but sometimes you end up driving yourself crazy trying to tweak the distortion, especially if there are numerous lines converging all over the place with patterned carpet, wallpapers, and such. And maybe I'm just a bit obsessiveGMCPhotographics said:mackguyver said:I remember they had really detailed instructions about this when they first released it, but I never got around to trying it. Have you made some? If so, I'm guessing the results are pretty good given that it's a profile of your own lens+camera combination.privatebydesign said:It isn't difficult or that time consuming to make your own with the free Adobe Lens Profile Creator.
Does it need much adjustment? I thought this lens was nearly perfect![]()
I do own and use the TS-E 17 & 24, but sometimes the 16-35 f/2.8 worked better for certain shots when time was of the essence (i.e. secondary shots outside of the shot list) and I foresee the f/4 IS serving the same role. Most real estate work is done on a very tight schedule.dilbert said:mackguyver said:For my commercial work - mostly building interiors - where I have used the 16-35 f/2.8 II and plan to use this lens, having perfectly straight lines is really important and having profiles saves a lot of time. The manual distortion tools work, but sometimes you end up driving yourself crazy trying to tweak the distortion, especially if there are numerous lines converging all over the place with patterned carpet, wallpapers, and such. And maybe I'm just a bit obsessiveGMCPhotographics said:mackguyver said:I remember they had really detailed instructions about this when they first released it, but I never got around to trying it. Have you made some? If so, I'm guessing the results are pretty good given that it's a profile of your own lens+camera combination.privatebydesign said:It isn't difficult or that time consuming to make your own with the free Adobe Lens Profile Creator.
Does it need much adjustment? I thought this lens was nearly perfect![]()
![]()
You should be using the TS/E lenses for this work.
mackguyver said:I remember they had really detailed instructions about this when they first released it, but I never got around to trying it. Have you made some? If so, I'm guessing the results are pretty good given that it's a profile of your own lens+camera combination.privatebydesign said:It isn't difficult or that time consuming to make your own with the free Adobe Lens Profile Creator.
Thanks for the update and I'm working my way through the threads, too... I know what you mean about the vignetting. In DxO, I frequently turn it off and on to see if I like the vignetting. For portraits and many other shots, I turn off the correction as I agree that it looks better.privatebydesign said:mackguyver said:I remember they had really detailed instructions about this when they first released it, but I never got around to trying it. Have you made some? If so, I'm guessing the results are pretty good given that it's a profile of your own lens+camera combination.privatebydesign said:It isn't difficult or that time consuming to make your own with the free Adobe Lens Profile Creator.
Sorry I am not getting some email notifications, not ignoring anybody!
I have made some, though I subsequently lost them on a HDD move but Adobe had come out with them by then anyway! I was thinking of making them for the 17TS-E when shifted but the lens is so good I haven't yet.
The results from the DIY seemed great, it always amazes me how much vignetting and "distortion" we have on even top flight lenses, so much so that I almost always leave vignetting on, 30+ years of looking at photos and they just don't look right without any vignetting![]()