ecka said:Sigmalux is still the best fast fifty
EOBeav said:There is absolutely no new information here that hasn't been presented before on The Digital Picture, et al. The bottom line is that if you shoot professionally wide open (>f/2), you'll want the 50L. Personally, I wouldn't turn one down if given one, but I do have the 50mm f/1.4 that works just fine.
I haven't tried the Nikon 50/1.8, but the Nikon 50/1.4 is certainly not killer. It's ok, but the Canon 50/1.2 draws better. People look at the resolution numbers and seem to ignore the actual photographs. To judge a lens properly, you have to look at the photographs it makes. Resolution numbers can only tell you so much. The Canon 50/1.2 has a very beautiful way of drawing pictures, especially in the f/1.6 to f/2.5 range. I've gotten wonderful results from it that go beyond what the resolution numbers would tell me. In that aperture range, there is no issue with focus shift. And with the 5D3, focus is more reliable than with past camera bodies. It seems to me that the lens designers had a certain artistic look in mind, and they succeeded brilliantly. Sure, we all wish for a sharper 50, as good as the $4K Leica 50/1.4, but the Canon 50/1.2 has some very positive qualities. And as for sharpness, the Canon 50/1.2 was among the sharpest lenses in LensRentals.com's "Great 50mm Shootout" - http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/01/the-great-50mm-shootout - sharper than Nikon, Sigma or Zeiss.Matthew Saville said:Nikon has gone the opposite route: Both their f/1.4 and f/1.8 50mm's are absolutely killer.
Daniel Flather said:The only people who bash the 1.2L are the people who can't afford it.
f/1.2 is so out of focus that your focus can be out of focus.
Mikael Risedal said:A very expensive lens for photographers with artistic ambitions.
I myself used Vaseline on the filter 30 years ago and together with Hasselblad.
The 50/1, 2 impresses many people,size and price, but the lens un-sharpness , focus shifts etc has never impressed me.
Zlatko said:but the Canon 50/1.2 has some very positive qualities. And as for sharpness, the Canon 50/1.2 was among the sharpest lenses in LensRentals.com's "Great 50mm Shootout" - http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/01/the-great-50mm-shootout - sharper than Nikon, Sigma or Zeiss.
drjlo said:Daniel Flather said:The only people who bash the 1.2L are the people who can't afford it.
I don't know about that, but despite all the bashing about its sharpness, according to Lensrentals testing, the 50L is the sharpest lens from f/1.2 to f/2.0 including alll Canon, Zeiss, Nikon, and Sigma 50mm choices.
What I love about the 50L is how it retains such nice contrast and color below f/2.0, which is something my Canon 50 f/1.8 or 50 f/1.4 could not do, not to mention the superior bokeh of 50L .