Show your Bird Portraits

My first Kingfisher since February 2020. Took 2000 shots at 20 fps with the ES this morning. The rear view was with the 100-500mm + 1.4xTC, the front at 500mm and upscaled 1.4x.

View attachment 196501View attachment 196502
Alan, honestly I'm not that big fan of your GIFs but this one is very reasonable: Is it really smashing the fish on the branch?! And I was thinking that that Night Heron with a fish that I posted ~month ago is to much "big mouth" :LOL:!
 
Upvote 0
I was about 25-35m away from the Kingfishers yesterday., standing the other side of a wire fence. I judge the quality of a lens and sensor by seeing how well they can capture acceptable images at extreme conditions as most camera-lens combinations give good images when the frame is filled. Here, the female KIngfisher was taken with the bare 100-500mm on the R5 (open beak) and the male with the 1.4xTC on at 700mm. The images are only 540 and 690 pixels high, the very limits of when you can expect any resolution of detail. (Can see from the frame numbers I had taken 1555 shots between them!)


View attachment 196506View attachment 196507
I like the second one better! Sounds promising to me since right now I'm waiting for my TC-14E III to be delivered. I will post photos ASAP (well, first I have to get these photos:rolleyes:)!
 
Upvote 0
That's pretty amazing! Wish our kingfishers were that colorful here. Guess that's one way to tenderize your meal. Curious what program you are using to create these great animated GIF's?
They don't need to "tenderize" the fish since they just swallow it :)! But they need to kill the fish first!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Today I was out in hunt for +/- breeding plumage Wandering Tattler (I still have to get a photo of one!). The only one that I found had some black feathers on the belly but far from breeding plumage...
On other hand I noticed it's hunting for something. Up to now I have seen it hunting shrimp in such a water or probing the mud on mud flats.
Here it was fishing! And off course - Pacific Golden Plower, female I believe, in nearly full breeding plumage.

DSC_2443_DxO.jpgDSC_2642_DxO.jpgDSC_2742_DxO.jpgDSC_2688_DxO.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13 users
Upvote 0
Alan, honestly I'm not that big fan of your GIFs but this one is very reasonable: Is it really smashing the fish on the branch?! And I was thinking that that Night Heron with a fish that I posted ~month ago is to much "big mouth" :LOL:!
Yes, it really is whacking the fish against the branch. They do this to remove fins and other projections that can stick in their throats rather than to kill the fish as they will swallow smaller ones without this fuss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
I have only once before seen a Goldcrest, ....
... until I processed the photos. Not the best, but they show the crests and the dumpy nature of these tiny birds. ...
Hi Alan!
Congrats to this great catch :)

"Not the best" is once again a little bit understatement. But I can imagine what you're thinking of and I suppose my question is pointing that way as I am interested in the R5 IQ and I am looking at the a little bit nervous BG of the first two pics:

Can you please tell me the exposure data, esp. the ISO value and how much sharpening you did in post?
Thanks in advance.
 
Upvote 0
Hi Alan!
Congrats to this great catch :)

"Not the best" is once again a little bit understatement. But I can imagine what you're thinking of and I suppose my question is pointing that way as I am interested in the R5 IQ and I am looking at the a little bit nervous BG of the first two pics:

Can you please tell me the exposure data, esp. the ISO value and how much sharpening you did in post?
Thanks in advance.
The camera was badly set up for those shots as I was too excited to optimise and I could see through the evf I could handle the conditions. f/7.1, iso3200 and 1/2500s, and pushed through 1.5ev in post so the effective iso was 10,000. They were all shot in RAW and processed in DxO PL4. The two shots of the male had bog standard DxO DEEPPrime noise reduction and lens sharpening set to normal. They are crops that were 2800 and 3200 wide, reduced by the site. The female shots are 100% crops that you are seeing at 1px = 1px of original, and have the EXIF data attached as the site did not reduce their size and strip out the data. I selectively sharpened the bird by having no sharpening from DxO and then processing in Topaz AI. That image of the female face-on has a diameter of only 500px. The second one is of similar size so background artefacts are all magnified in these crops - I think it amazing that one can get such detail from a crop of that tiny size at an iso of 10k! Canon wasn't lying when Rudy said the 45Mpx sensor of the R5 with an AA-filter outresolves the 50 Mpx 5DSR: here are measurements of sensor resolution from Optyczne (note the older Z7/D850 45 Mpx sensors are as good as the R5).

142922_C5DsR_rozdz_m.jpg250709_CR5_rozdz_m.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Upvote 0
Very nice series, ISv.
d055.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
And from today: the primary goal was to get a photos of the Japanese Bush Warbler. Very hard to spot but you have a chance in this season (breeding). Today I was very lucky! And some photos of the Red-billed Leiothrix...

DSC_2953_DxO.jpgDSC_2998_DxO.jpgDSC_3034_DxO.jpgDSC_3136_DxO.jpgDSC_3144_DxO.jpgDSC_3180_DxO.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17 users
Upvote 0
... f/7.1, iso3200 and 1/2500s, and pushed through 1.5ev in post so the effective iso was 10,000. They were all shot in RAW and processed in DxO PL4.
... I think it amazing that one can get such detail from a crop of that tiny size at an iso of 10k! ...

Yes, very impressing.
Thanks, Alan, for this detailled reply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0