Show your Bird Portraits

It was a bright day, but in the shadows. Not deeply in the forest.
NR just with default settings in DPP.
This is the robin (ISO6400) with NR off (colour and luminance NR turned to "0", zero, Moiré at "2"), still impressive IMO:

View attachment 214676
I agree, it looks good even without NR. If you filtered out most of the red channel, it probably would look great as a high contrast black and white. We're really lucky how far technology has progressed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I do you adjust the NR settings a special way in DXO? I ask because I think your photo's NR looks less obvious than what I get at 10,000 ISO.
Standard. I might have done a round of Topaz on it afterwards, which I occasionally do for very noisy backgrounds but I usually write this in the name before ".jpg". It does look like I have done, on reflection as it is very clean.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
I really like your shots, shire guy.
a025.gif


 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I was pretty impressed by the RF 200-800mm at 1600mm with the RF 2x on my charts. So, I took it out with the R5 to a woodpile where I frequently see a Little Owl. It's 60+ m from the road, and I have been photographing the Owl for years and can compare with back images. I have to say these are the most detailed images I have ever got. The Owl is only a 1000px high even at 1600mm. I also took some at 800, 600 and 500mm for comparison (displayed in descending order of size). It was easy to use the 1600mm hand held as the eyeAF worked well and mitigated the usuall shaking where the lens loses focus. The 500 and 600 were with a tripod.309A4806-DxO_little_Owl_1600mm_HH_LS+2_eyes.jpg309A4717-DxO_little_Owl_800mm_HH.jpg309A4948-DxO_little_Owl_600mm_Tripod_eye.jpg309A4934-DxO_little_Owl_500mm_Tripod.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 12 users
Upvote 0
Oh, and if you don't want to lug around 3kg of camera, lens and extender, here is a shot by wife using the R7 and RF 100-400mm as taken and then upscaled 3x with Topaz to a similar size as the 1600 on R5.3R3A6584-DxO_little_Owl_400m.jpg3R3A6584-DxO_little_Owl_400m-topaz-enhance-3x.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 10 users
Upvote 0
I was pretty impressed by the RF 200-800mm at 1600mm with the RF 2x on my charts. So, I took it out with the R5 to a woodpile where I frequently see a Little Owl. It's 60+ m from the road, and I have been photographing the Owl for years and can compare with back images. I have to say these are the most detailed images I have ever got. The Owl is only a 1000px high even at 1600mm. I also took some at 800, 600 and 500mm for comparison (displayed in descending order of size). It was easy to use the 1600mm hand held as the eyeAF worked well and mitigated the usuall shaking where the lens loses focus. The 500 and 600 were with a tripod.View attachment 214742View attachment 214743View attachment 214744View attachment 214745
Oh, the horrors of shooting at f18! o_O You're going to break the Internet with a photo like this. ;)
Excellent job Alan.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users
Upvote 0