I agree, it looks good even without NR. If you filtered out most of the red channel, it probably would look great as a high contrast black and white. We're really lucky how far technology has progressed.It was a bright day, but in the shadows. Not deeply in the forest.
NR just with default settings in DPP.
This is the robin (ISO6400) with NR off (colour and luminance NR turned to "0", zero, Moiré at "2"), still impressive IMO:
View attachment 214676
Standard. I might have done a round of Topaz on it afterwards, which I occasionally do for very noisy backgrounds but I usually write this in the name before ".jpg". It does look like I have done, on reflection as it is very clean.I do you adjust the NR settings a special way in DXO? I ask because I think your photo's NR looks less obvious than what I get at 10,000 ISO.
Thanks, I'll try putting a few through topaz after and see what happens.Standard. I might have done a round of Topaz on it afterwards, which I occasionally do for very noisy backgrounds but I usually write this in the name before ".jpg". It does look like I have done, on reflection as it is very clean.
Dude, you are the Owl Whisperer!Found this incredible Great Gray Owl this afternoon at Sax Zim Bog. I have been up here all week on vacation. Still have at least 2 more days. 7D mkll & EF600 f4 ll
Jeremy
View attachment 214724
I always thought it existed only in cartoons, until I saw one in Mojave if I remember well.Some more fun with a Greater Roadrunner. Escargot anyone (sans butter and garlic)?
R5 with 200-800 all at 800mm f9.
View attachment 214646View attachment 214647View attachment 214648View attachment 214649View attachment 214650View attachment 214651




Oh, the horrors of shooting at f18!I was pretty impressed by the RF 200-800mm at 1600mm with the RF 2x on my charts. So, I took it out with the R5 to a woodpile where I frequently see a Little Owl. It's 60+ m from the road, and I have been photographing the Owl for years and can compare with back images. I have to say these are the most detailed images I have ever got. The Owl is only a 1000px high even at 1600mm. I also took some at 800, 600 and 500mm for comparison (displayed in descending order of size). It was easy to use the 1600mm hand held as the eyeAF worked well and mitigated the usuall shaking where the lens loses focus. The 500 and 600 were with a tripod.View attachment 214742View attachment 214743View attachment 214744View attachment 214745