Show your Bird Portraits

Unknown chick, a body only a mother could love.

Guess the species..

57161-170517222340.jpeg
 
Upvote 0
applecider said:
Who knew that coots make good mothers, but they do much better than mallards and wood ducks (who do after all throw their babies out the window shortly after hatching.).

57161-170517222453.jpeg


How do I post so that the images don't scroll?

Nice pics. Coot chicks are about the ugliest creatures you could find. The turn into reasonably respectable adults. Almost an 'ugly duckling' story.

You can post in the same way we always have (baring the hiatus of some time ago): click on the Attachments and other options button at the bottom left of the screen select a picture from the drop down menu and push Post. :)
 
Upvote 0
dpc said:
Red-breasted nuthatch at and around a feeding station in my backyard this afternoon. They're becoming quite brave. My wife or I can come within a metre and a half or so and they show not the slightest concern despite the fact they're at somewhat less than head height. 8)

I really like the second picture. Well done, dpc. :)
 
Upvote 0
Click said:
dpc said:
Red-breasted nuthatch at and around a feeding station in my backyard this afternoon. They're becoming quite brave. My wife or I can come within a metre and a half or so and they show not the slightest concern despite the fact they're at somewhat less than head height. 8)

I really like the second picture. Well done, dpc. :)


Thanks, Click! :)
 
Upvote 0
Some other shots of my favorite "Heron cendré" which live in Chantilly Castle area (north of Paris, France). Thi fantastic bird is very accustomed to human proximity, and i could take quite nices shots. here some samples of a large serie. I were going progressively closer..... then.... Birds in flight!!!

Always same equipment EOS 70D, EF 100-400 IS II
 

Attachments

  • IMG2_17153rec.jpg
    IMG2_17153rec.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 123
  • IMG2_17191rec.jpg
    IMG2_17191rec.jpg
    2.2 MB · Views: 120
  • IMG2_17196rec.jpg
    IMG2_17196rec.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 111
Upvote 0
1. White-crowned sparrow
2. Ovenbird: This individual was displaying some odd behaviour. He wanted to get up on a birdbath from the ground. Instead of flying up like all the other birds, he tried to hop up even though it was way too high for him. It was rather comical, actually. He finally gave up and decided not to have a drink.
 

Attachments

  • _36A7895_DxO.jpg
    _36A7895_DxO.jpg
    333.2 KB · Views: 97
  • _36A7836_DxO-Edit.jpg
    _36A7836_DxO-Edit.jpg
    239.8 KB · Views: 101
Upvote 0
1. Female house sparrow
2. White-crowned sparrow scarfing down seeds broadcast onto the ground from an overhead bird feeder
3. Robin standing on one of my birdbaths giving me the once over
 

Attachments

  • _36A7801_DxO.jpg
    _36A7801_DxO.jpg
    228.2 KB · Views: 92
  • _36A7813_DxO.jpg
    _36A7813_DxO.jpg
    313 KB · Views: 98
  • _36A7867_DxO.jpg
    _36A7867_DxO.jpg
    152.2 KB · Views: 97
Upvote 0
You know how I bang on about good the Sigma 150-600mm C can be at 600mm in the face of those who claim it falls apart after 400mm. Here's a little quiz. I took a shot this morning with the 400mm DO II + 1.4x TC at 560mm on the 5DSR of a male kingfisher, and I could compare it with a shot of the same bird from the same spot with the Sigma 600. Both were processed from RAW with no PP other than DxO PRIME followed by USM at 100% 0.9 px. First, the full scene of one at 560/600mm (reduced in size) to show the size of the cropping. Then the two shots.

1. Are they acceptably sharp, given the severe cropping?
2. Which one is from the Sigma?
 

Attachments

  • Uncropped.jpg
    Uncropped.jpg
    695.6 KB · Views: 104
  • kingfisher+fish_NoExif.jpg
    kingfisher+fish_NoExif.jpg
    681.3 KB · Views: 119
  • kingfisher_NoExif.jpg
    kingfisher_NoExif.jpg
    729.7 KB · Views: 149
Upvote 0