I hear the same thing from many folks I take out on bird walks, except real ones have a low pitched, descending coo coo coo, not beep! beep!I always thought it existed only in cartoons, until I saw one in Mojave if I remember well.![]()
Beautiful!Oh, and if you don't want to lug around 3kg of camera, lens and extender, here is a shot by wife using the R7 and RF 100-400mm as taken and then upscaled 3x with Topaz to a similar size as the 1600 on R5.View attachment 214746View attachment 214747
High Fidelity v2. It’s the most natural.Beautiful!
Topaz has four upscaling modes or algorithms I'm not sure the correct terminology. Which did you use?
I've noticed for humans, face detect can make it look worseHigh Fidelity v2. It’s the most natural.
I nevertheless prefer the meep meep!I hear the same thing from many folks I take out on bird walks, except real ones have a low pitched, descending coo coo coo, not beep! beep!![]()
I far prefer the background obtained with the 200-800, yet, the owl is really cute!Oh, and if you don't want to lug around 3kg of camera, lens and extender, here is a shot by wife using the R7 and RF 100-400mm as taken and then upscaled 3x with Topaz to a similar size as the 1600 on R5.View attachment 214746View attachment 214747
No problem - here's a choice of two blurred backgrounds for you. Actually, I'm deadly serious here: we currently manipulate background using lens aperture as an analog tool, but just as mobile phones blur background digitally (as does Zoom if you want) for portraits, so digital methods will increasingly do the same for traditional photography obviating the need for wide lenses for those who want. The field blur in the bottom image pretty closely mimicks the one I had at 1600mm and nicer than the shorter focal lengths with the 200-800mm.I far prefer the background obtained with the 200-800, yet, the owl is really cute!![]()


If, in our Kodachrome days, we could have imagined all the possibilities and options we now have...No problem - here's a choice of two blurred backgrounds for you. Actually, I'm deadly serious here: we currently manipulate background using lens aperture as an analog tool, but just as mobile phones blur background digitally (as does Zoom if you want) for portraits, so digital methods will increasingly do the same for traditional photography obviating the need for wide lenses for those who want. The field blur in the bottom image pretty closely mimicks the one I had at 1600mm and nicer than the shorter focal lengths with the 200-800mm.
View attachment 214761View attachment 214762



Just the commons from my very short walk in the park today...
Once I finished with the Red-crested Cardinal I noticed someone sitting on "my bench". And my backpack was still there! The immature Saffron Finches don't obviously understand the "rule of privacy"!
We would have been urged to stop reading Science FictionIf, in our Kodachrome days, we could have imagined all the possibilities and options we now have...![]()
You just do not want to cross some birds...






Thanks Click!Nice series, ISv.![]()

Very good one!!!We would have been urged to stop reading Science Fiction