Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

[dave]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

I like the new design of the lenses too. Very clean and simple looking.

+1

They look schmick.

 

[ScottyP]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

Not exactly what was updated on the 120-300. Looks like MTF charts are the same. Perhaps it is lighter and focuses faster?

That is what I was thinking. I thought the 120-300 2.8 OS was released pretty recently. Like about a year ago?

And if I read the description I would have answered my own question

With redesigned mechanics and performance, this Sports lens is an update from its predecessor released in February 2011.

Good God, yes. Just a year between generations/upgrades. Canon still goes 10 years or more even in the digital age. Reproducing at that rate, they could evolve past Canon in quality in not too long. ???

 

[Imagination_landB]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

ahhhhh i BOUGHT THE 120-300 A MONTH AGO! lets hope that its just lighter .. i saw that a focus switch and a metal lens hood has been add..anyways mine works perfectly, this lens is reeeeeally good, i was not expecing a replacement anytime soon, but sigma is always improving and pleases us with nice products.

 

[brianleighty]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

Sweet! I'm looking to get the 85 1.4 after renting it for my last wedding. If they do as good on the 35 as they did on the 85 then this will be a lens I look into.

 

[brianleighty]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

Just found this and translated it with google chrome:
http://www.digifotopro.nl/content/preview-sigma-35mm-f-14-dg-hsm

 

[dr croubie]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

70-300L

120-300/2.8

70-300L

120-300/2.8

35/1.4 Samyang

35/1.4 Sigma

35/1.4 Samyang

35/1.4 Sigma


AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAArgh decisions.
I can probably console myself with the 70-300L being more "walkaround", which I do a lot when birdhunting. Although i would very much like a 300/2.8, and if that 300/2.8 comes in black with an extra 120-299mm as well, then maybe I might have to sell my first and only L to upgrade.

As for Sigma vs Samyang. hmmm. The Samyang is great, great IQ, but I bought mine 2nd hand after a fall, it still works but it's got its quirks. I was contemplating if I could palm it off to someone and get a new (or better-used) one for less than $100 out-of-pocket then I might consider doing that one day in the future. Now i've got this to consider too, if the IQ beats or very-nears the Samyang, and has AF (even dodgy Sigma AF is enough, mostly it'll hyperfocal on MF anyway), then this is worth contemplating too. So's the new Schneider Kreuznach 35/1.4, but that's going to probably be MF and in Zeiss-Preiss territory.

 

[wickidwombat]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

I find it fascinating that an upgrade on the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM has happened so quickly. The previous model of the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM was almost there for me, just lacking very slightly in some key performance areas.

As people are saying "Sigma do listen", there's a big chance I'll pick up this lens. If the required performance is there, my EF 300 f/2.8is could be headed for retirement. Think about it, a 120-300 f/2.8 zoom makes a pretty compelling case, especially if the critical areas of IQ and AF speed and consistent build quality cross into premium territory.

-PW

Ditto and if the 35 is anywhere near as good as the 85 then I'm gonna be all over that one too the siggy 50f1.4 new version blows the canon lenses into the weeds

 

[glb2012]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

35mm f/1.4 specs and charts (67mm filter, 9 rounded blades, etc)

http://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/product/art/a_35_14.html

I own the 85mm f/1.4 and love it (and also own the Canon 35L).

 

[brianleighty]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

35mm f/1.4 specs and charts (67mm filter, 9 rounded blades, etc)

http://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/product/art/a_35_14.html

I own the 85mm f/1.4 and love it (and also own the Canon 35L).

I never see vignetting charts but is it just me or does that look like really bad vignetting?

 

[brianleighty]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

Just saw this:
http://thedigitalpicture.com/News/News-Post.aspx?News=3044
Pretty much the same but it also mentions a usb dock for changing lens parameters. Could be interesting.

 

[glb2012]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

Just saw this:
http://thedigitalpicture.com/News/News-Post.aspx?News=3044
Pretty much the same but it also mentions a usb dock for changing lens parameters. Could be interesting.

USB Docking is very interesting indeed...Sigma wants to get rid of the "poor QC " stigma. Which in my opinion, they already did it with the 85mm f1.4 (at least my copy is as good as my other two L primes).

 

[ekstasis16]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

I've been eyeing the 120-300 for quite some time, but have been nervous about focus performance compared to the Canon 300 2.8. Anyone used the previous Sigma 120-300? How does it perform? This new version could be very tempting for football season...

 

[Bosman]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

I saw this news Monday morning when looking at my zite news app. That 35 is nice, I was ready to consider purchasing already. The look is stunning too.

 

[dr croubie]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

I've been eyeing the 120-300 for quite some time, but have been nervous about focus performance compared to the Canon 300 2.8. Anyone used the previous Sigma 120-300? How does it perform? This new version could be very tempting for football season...

Bryan seemed to like the first version...

 

[mrsfotografie]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

This link explains Sigma's new "global vision."

http://sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/

Not sure I like the 'C', 'A' and 'S' identification; somehow reminds me of 'creative modes' on a camera. :

 

[DavidRiesenberg]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

I am thinking Sigma will do an extensive overhaul of their lenses now to match their new "philosophy". I was thinking of picking up a 85mm f/1.4 but I don't know if now is the right time.

 

[keithfullermusic]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

If the pictures those lenses take are as sweet as they look, I'm getting that 35.

A+ for design Sigma.

 

[pwp]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

70-300L
120-300/2.8
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAArgh decisions.
I can probably console myself with the 70-300L being more "walkaround", which I do a lot when birdhunting. Although i would very much like a 300/2.8, and if that 300/2.8 comes in black with an extra 120-299mm as well...

You bet the 70-300L is more "walkaround". Compare the weight!
70-300L 1050g
120-300/2.8 2950g
EF 300 f/2.8II 2400g
Only Mr Muscles would consider the Sigma as a walkaround. Wouldn't it be cool if the Sigma weighed in at a less punishing weight?

-PW

 

[HarryWintergreen]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

I find it fascinating that an upgrade on the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM has happened so quickly. The previous model of the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM was almost there for me, just lacking very slightly in some key performance areas.

As people are saying "Sigma do listen", there's a big chance I'll pick up this lens. If the required performance is there, my EF 300 f/2.8is could be headed for retirement. Think about it, a 120-300 f/2.8 zoom makes a pretty compelling case, especially if the critical areas of IQ and AF speed and consistent build quality cross into premium territory.

-PW

+1!!! Exactly what I am thinking resp hoping for. MTF charts seem to be quite promising. Let's hope it is really a X-300 lens (and not something 260ish).

 

[that1guyy]

Re: Sigma Announces Three New Lenses: 35 f/1.4, 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS & 120-300 f/2.8 OS

Liking the looks of the 35 1.4 lens. Right now I'm considering picking up the Sigma 30mm f1.4 (which is a fantastic lens), but it is crop only. If, a few years down the line I upgrade to FF, I'd have to sell. If this lens is under $800, I can have a great 50mm equivalent for current crop camera (approx 50) and even on full frame a 35mm looks awesome. I am excited to see some samples.