dadgummit said:dadgummit said:facedodge said:Not exactly what was updated on the 120-300. Looks like MTF charts are the same. Perhaps it is lighter and focuses faster?
That is what I was thinking. I thought the 120-300 2.8 OS was released pretty recently. Like about a year ago?
And if I read the description I would have answered my own question
With redesigned mechanics and performance, this Sports lens is an update from its predecessor released in February 2011.
Ditto and if the 35 is anywhere near as good as the 85 then I'm gonna be all over that one too the siggy 50f1.4 new version blows the canon lenses into the weedspwp said:I find it fascinating that an upgrade on the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM has happened so quickly. The previous model of the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM was almost there for me, just lacking very slightly in some key performance areas.
As people are saying "Sigma do listen", there's a big chance I'll pick up this lens. If the required performance is there, my EF 300 f/2.8is could be headed for retirement. Think about it, a 120-300 f/2.8 zoom makes a pretty compelling case, especially if the critical areas of IQ and AF speed and consistent build quality cross into premium territory.
-PW
I never see vignetting charts but is it just me or does that look like really bad vignetting?glb2012 said:35mm f/1.4 specs and charts (67mm filter, 9 rounded blades, etc)
http://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/product/art/a_35_14.html
I own the 85mm f/1.4 and love it (and also own the Canon 35L).
brianleighty said:Just saw this:
http://thedigitalpicture.com/News/News-Post.aspx?News=3044
Pretty much the same but it also mentions a usb dock for changing lens parameters. Could be interesting.
ekstasis16 said:I've been eyeing the 120-300 for quite some time, but have been nervous about focus performance compared to the Canon 300 2.8. Anyone used the previous Sigma 120-300? How does it perform? This new version could be very tempting for football season...
AdamJ said:
dr croubie said:70-300L
120-300/2.8
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAArgh decisions.
I can probably console myself with the 70-300L being more "walkaround", which I do a lot when birdhunting. Although i would very much like a 300/2.8, and if that 300/2.8 comes in black with an extra 120-299mm as well...
pwp said:I find it fascinating that an upgrade on the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM has happened so quickly. The previous model of the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM was almost there for me, just lacking very slightly in some key performance areas.
As people are saying "Sigma do listen", there's a big chance I'll pick up this lens. If the required performance is there, my EF 300 f/2.8is could be headed for retirement. Think about it, a 120-300 f/2.8 zoom makes a pretty compelling case, especially if the critical areas of IQ and AF speed and consistent build quality cross into premium territory.
-PW