Mikehit said:
9VIII said:
Mikehit said:
9VIII said:
Mikehit said:
9VIII said:
But that’s all totally beside the point, You guys are all running around screaming “APS-H is dead” when I don’t even think it’s necessary, it’s not the point ot the petition, the point is pixel density.
Forget APS-H exists and make this all about a 97MP APS-C sensor.
What are you on about. If your petition is about pixel density why the hell does it talk about a long-dead format?
Because that is the sensor that
Canon has been demonstrating!
For their security cameras :
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/latest/photo-news/watch-canon-show-off-a-120mp-sensor-eos-5ds-in-photokina-tech-demo-95831
check out Canon’s tech demo with AP where they show off the sort of thing they hope to achieve in the future, in the shape of a Canon EOS 5DS kitted out with an impressive 120-million-pixel APS-H size imaging sensor.
And of course you forgot to quote the important bit:
They stress that this is not a camera in actual development, just an indication of where imaging technology could go
Absolutely no indication they are looking at APS-H for DSLR. It was demonstration of technology, not sensor size.
You and everyone else are dead wrong about Canon not advertising APS-H in consumer photography applications. Stop trying to weasel your way out of it.
The statement that “this is not a camera in actual development” is not a direct statement on sensor format.
Could it be inferred that they are opposed to using APS-H in consumer products? Yes, but that’s still just your assumption, and even if they outright said “Everyone at Canon hates APS-H and we’re glad it’s dead”, that wouldn’t stop them from putting it in a camera if consumer demand were there.
Neuro is really the only one who brings up the only valid point, the petition is DOA, so the entire discussion is really moot, regardless of how good the 120MP APS-H sensor actually is.