The Canon EOS R6 V and RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ are Coming May 13

YouTube is one of the most popular sites for misinformation as well. So, if you don't give the title and content, and better still author, you are directing someone down an unknown rabbit hole.

As is this site but that doesn't appear to bother you.

How would anyone know where on YouTube your link would take them when seeing your post?

View attachment 229202

Since the title of this post is The Canon EOS R6 V and RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ are Coming May 13 anyone with a degree of common sense would understand that it is a response to information on the R6 V.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
It's a new video from Ordinary Filmmaker titled "Canon Shocks by giving video shooters key features they demanded".
I watched a few of Ordinary Filmmaker's videos and get a strong feeling that most of them were just dressed up/recycled stuff from Canon Rumors (i.e. this site). There is no real new info, and it takes longer to watch the video than reading the succinct summaries here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
As is this site but that doesn't appear to bother you.
Posts and links on this site have a title and/or a description. Notice how you know where a click will take you? That's the difference between a courteously posted link and anonymous slop.

Discolsure.png

Since the title of this post is The Canon EOS R6 V and RF 20-50mm f/4L IS USM PZ are Coming May 13 anyone with a degree of common sense would understand that it is a response to information on the R6 V.
Anyone with a modicum of common sense who has spent any amount of time on the Internet knows that there are always random, tangential and irrelevant links being posted in forum threads. There was nothing to distinguish yours from such slop, quite the opposite – typically when irrelevant (or worse) links are posted, the poster will actively try to anonymize or mask the destination of the click.

Anyone with a degree of common sense would not click on an anonymous link. Apparently you think it's fine to post something like click this cool link I found. Good luck with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
Upvote 0
I watched a few of Ordinary Filmmaker's videos and get a strong feeling that most of them were just dressed up/recycled stuff from Canon Rumors (i.e. this site). There is no real new info, and it takes longer to watch the video than reading the succinct summaries here.
That's a general problem with YouTube, apart from its reliability. A few points are spread out and padded to make many minutes of entertainment that could be summed up in a couple of sentences or less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
I watched a few of Ordinary Filmmaker's videos and get a strong feeling that most of them were just dressed up/recycled stuff from Canon Rumors (i.e. this site). There is no real new info, and it takes longer to watch the video than reading the succinct summaries here.

I think everyone would agree that most YT videos are verbose yet some have a level of details that can't be found on most forums. Ordinary Filmmakers video has more detail then information I have found on this specific topic currently. And I do review many of the Canon sites, most daily.

Also, in his videos he is pretty consistent giving credit to his sources when he can, he also holds them accountable for mis-information when he can validate inconsistencies.

When you talk about reliability, this site has the same challenges as YT. This article in particular The Canon EOS R7 Mark II is in the Wild has been canon fodder for many in the industry for it's "reliability" and back peddling but I have yet to see anyone reference that fact.
 
Upvote 0
Maybe it is the combination of your EF 600mm with the R7 that is the problem. My wife was using the R7 with the RF 100-500mm last week and had no problems. Here are all of her shots. She is no expert BIF photgrapher - she just points in the right direction with settings programmed by me. There is one image by me from last summer - the Swallow in full flight, and they are very difficult to shoot. They are all very small crops, not reduced in size.

View attachment 229185
I like the swallow in particular, great shot, Alan. I know how hard it is to catch a swallow in flight. The other BiF images are more from the backside, so the AF already had a relatively long time to get the bird in focus. I personally prefer more images of birds approaching or passing exactly by, so the AF has not that much time to focus on. What definitely helps is switching off eye detection, maybe simply because the R7's processor has to process less data.

I am not sure whether my R7 in particular struggles with with the EF 600mm III, I had the same problems with my old EF 500mm f/4.5 - okay, that's a vintage lens - but also with my RF 200-800mm the R7 doesn't perform always well when I try to shoot against some skies. Interestingly, the Nikons of my wife display the same behavior in some special light conditions, we asked ourselves already if this could be caused by polarization effects (she is a physicist, too). I should start taking notes about these settings. But when I am shooting birds I don't want to distract myself. Well, when I want more reliability, I take my R5 II, like in the DSLR times, when I switched from my 7D's to my 5D3/4 to have a better AF performance.
 
Upvote 0
That's a general problem with YouTube, apart from its reliability. A few points are spread out and padded to make many minutes of entertainment that could be summed up in a couple of sentences or less.
The most useless and precious lifetime consuming youtube videos are those with guys sitting at their desks, presenting some cameras and/or lenses and talking blah blah (add n-times blah, n = 1, 2, 3, ....).

For birders, I can recommend the videos posted by Aussi photographer Duade Paton, because he goes out and presents the local wildlife, beautiful birds, and he talks only briefly about what you really need to know about a particular gear for wildlife photography. But this guy knows what he is doing, and he is the opposite of a know-it-all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
I like the swallow in particular, great shot, Alan. I know how hard it is to catch a swallow in flight. The other BiF images are more from the backside, so the AF already had a relatively long time to get the bird in focus. I personally prefer more images of birds approaching or passing exactly by, so the AF has not that much time to focus on. What definitely helps is switching off eye detection, maybe simply because the R7's processor has to process less data.

I am not sure whether my R7 in particular struggles with with the EF 600mm III, I had the same problems with my old EF 500mm f/4.5 - okay, that's a vintage lens - but also with my RF 200-800mm the R7 doesn't perform always well when I try to shoot against some skies. Interestingly, the Nikons of my wife display the same behavior in some special light conditions, we asked ourselves already if this could be caused by polarization effects (she is a physicist, too). I should start taking notes about these settings. But when I am shooting birds I don't want to distract myself. Well, when I want more reliability, I take my R5 II, like in the DSLR times, when I switched from my 7D's to my 5D3/4 to have a better AF performance.
The only one remotely from the back was the Peregrine Falcon. Here are some of mine, taken with the RF 100-400mm on the R7. Puffins fly really fast as do Guillemots, and they are approaching or passing by. I used the R7/RF 100-400mm on a trip to Skomer when I had problems carrying heavier gear. One more of a Marsh Harrier with the RF 100-500 on the R7.

3R3A9281-DxO_Puffin_flying-ls-ttssh.jpg3R3A9379-DxO_Puffin_flying-ls-tssh.jpg3R3A9430-DxO_Puffin_flying-ls-tssh.jpg3R3A9793-DxO_Puffin_flying-ls-ts.jpeg3R3A9854-DxO_Guillemot_flying-ls-tssh.jpg3R3A6185-DxO_marsh_harrier_flying-ls-Sm.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Upvote 0
The most useless and precious lifetime consuming youtube videos are those with guys sitting at their desks, presenting some cameras and/or lenses and talking blah blah (add n-times blah, n = 1, 2, 3, ....).

For birders, I can recommend the videos posted by Aussi photographer Duade Paton, because he goes out and presents the local wildlife, beautiful birds, and he talks only briefly about what you really need to know about a particular gear for wildlife photography. But this guy knows what he is doing, and he is the opposite of a know-it-all.
He is good as well as a few others like Jan Wegener. If a link is given specifically to them, I might go to it. But, if anyone does post a link, it is a courtesy briefly to say what it is about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0