paul13walnut5 said:How can anybody laugh at a man with the guts to wear (only!) gold y fronts?
markphoto said:The Wedding Pro Flash Bracket looks promising from Really Right Stuff.
Anyone have this and can provide some feedback?
http://reallyrightstuff.com/ProductDesc.aspx?code=WPF-QR&type=4&eq=&desc=WPF-QR%3a-Flash-Bracket-with-fixed-mount
RLPhoto said:I finally bought this bracket. It's small and compact but does the job.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=invoice&A=details&Q=&sku=464814&is=REG
digital paradise said:RLPhoto said:I finally bought this bracket. It's small and compact but does the job.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=invoice&A=details&Q=&sku=464814&is=REG
Can I ask why you chose this style? Why lower the flash to the lens rather than raise it?
RLPhoto said:This is good stuff. I Might look into one, What bracket is lightweight and can easily switch orientation? I usually carry two cameras on me at all times at a wedding so a lightweight bracket would be appreciated.
Zooming will be a non-issue but I will need a bracket that allows easy lens changes.
digital paradise said:RLPhoto said:I finally bought this bracket. It's small and compact but does the job.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=invoice&A=details&Q=&sku=464814&is=REG
Can I ask why you chose this style? Why lower the flash to the lens rather than raise it?
neuroanatomist said:digital paradise said:RLPhoto said:I finally bought this bracket. It's small and compact but does the job.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=invoice&A=details&Q=&sku=464814&is=REG
Can I ask why you chose this style? Why lower the flash to the lens rather than raise it?
The CB Mini brackets are intended primarily for shooting in portrait orientation, IMO, so the flash is above the lens axis. If one will be switching back and forth from landscape to portrait orientation, an adjustable blacket is a much better choice, IMO. I use one of the RRS ring brackets, personally.
RLPhoto said:I was talking to a fellow photographer who works weddings all the time. We were discussing on-camera flash and he spoke of always using a flash bracket for on camera.
I've seen them before, those large hulking contraptions that some photogs carry around on a wedding. Is it really necessary though anymore? I think one of those would slow me down but if the benefits are really worth the hassle i'd might look into it.
Supposedly, it will remove the horrid side-shadow when shot in portrait orientation but why not just use a TTL cable and hold the flash in proper orientation rather than carry a bulky and heavy bracket? Or just bounce?
Dunno, It was interesting enough to want some opinions on brackets.
digital paradise said:markphoto said:The Wedding Pro Flash Bracket looks promising from Really Right Stuff.
Anyone have this and can provide some feedback?
http://reallyrightstuff.com/ProductDesc.aspx?code=WPF-QR&type=4&eq=&desc=WPF-QR%3a-Flash-Bracket-with-fixed-mount
This is the bracket I use. It is very versatile and gets the flash higher in relationship to the lens. I will always try to bounce first. If I can't then I pullout the bracket and shoot direct. I also will also crank up the ISO. A very solid product.
paul13walnut5 said:I remember the metz hammerheads well, they date from a time when AA's couldn't hold as much of a charge and things like nicads were the best we could hope for.
I liked the stability of them, there wasn't IS in those days either...
I generally OC cable or wireless flash these days, but I still have a flash grip which occassionally gets a run out for video.
Canon did do an A-TTL hammerhead which I believe can be used manually with E-TTL cameras, but the speedlite form is just what folks prefer these days.
RLPhoto said:but why not just use a TTL cable and hold the flash in proper orientation rather than carry a bulky and heavy bracket? Or just bounce?
RLPhoto said:but why not just use a TTL cable and hold the flash in proper orientation rather than carry a bulky and heavy bracket?