• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

The Long and Short of it. 2 Photos from the same Place

Apr 15, 2011
1,371
195
21,163
San Juan, PR
I was always annoyed by the "zoom with your feet" statement. Sometimes you can't. I usually can't. At a recent baseball game I was allowed on the TV platform just past the outfield fence. It's marked 400 feet about 5 feet in front of me in the below 2 photos. I am standing on metal box about 10 feet wide 4 feet deep, and 7 feet high, no railing. The TV guy is next to me so I can't move much or shake the box.

Anyway, the long photo is a 7D with a 400mm f2.8 IS and 1.4X extender. The wide photo is a 5D and 8-15mm. Both photos have some cropping.


Untitled
by RexPhoto91, on Flickr


REX50013
by RexPhoto91, on Flickr

Do you have any similar pairs of photos taken from the same place without taking a walk? Let's see.
 
TexPhoto said:
Do you have any similar pairs of photos taken from the same place without taking a walk? Let's see.


Apologies for them being a little underexposed, but IIRC this was getting pretty late in the day, and the sky was a lot brighter than the landscape.

16mm (16–35 L II)


35mm (16–35 L II)


70mm (70–300 L)


300mm (70–300 L)


1260mm (70–300 L at 300mm w/ stacked 1.4x and 3x teleconverters).
 
Upvote 0
But dgstwood, you could have zoomed with your feet in your example ! ;)

I suppose in reality all lenses are compromises of one sort or another. If we could get an f1.8 zoom that went from 24 to 400, weighted 8 oz and cost $400, had the same IQ and size of a 35/2 IS the we would all be using that lens.
 
Upvote 0
I do not think that the phrase 'zoom with your feet' was coined to suggest that you should only use one prime lens and attempt telephoto shots with a fisheye lens. ;)

Both zooms and primes have their pros and cons. Use the tools that are best for the job. :)
 
Upvote 0
dgatwood said:
Apologies for them being a little underexposed, but IIRC this was getting pretty late in the day, and the sky was a lot brighter than the landscape.


I think you need a little tweak there. Looks like the landscape is 100% in the shadow of clouds at that moment. I don't think there is anyway to get a good photo in that situation. But hey post processing challenge time! (Hope that's OK)


123
by RexPhoto91, on Flickr
 
Upvote 0
TexPhoto said:
dgatwood said:
Apologies for them being a little underexposed, but IIRC this was getting pretty late in the day, and the sky was a lot brighter than the landscape.


I think you need a little tweak there. Looks like the landscape is 100% in the shadow of clouds at that moment. I don't think there is anyway to get a good photo in that situation. But hey post processing challenge time! (Hope that's OK)


123
by RexPhoto91, on Flickr


Sure. Have fun. I have processed copies in LR; I was just too lazy to do the extra work of shoving rendered versions out to my website alongside the RAW files over a slow network connection. ;)
 
Upvote 0
TexPhoto said:
I think you need a little tweak there. Looks like the landscape is 100% in the shadow of clouds at that moment. I don't think there is anyway to get a good photo in that situation. But hey post processing challenge time! (Hope that's OK)


123
by RexPhoto91, on Flickr

Blimey, give me your e-mail address, I have about 2,000 photos for you to process ;D
 
Upvote 0
tex...i like your baseball shots! :)

here we have the awesome 24-70 2.8ii for basketball baseline action.

three different shots from the exact same spot within a 6 minute window.

all shots at ISO 6400 on a 1dx
 

Attachments

  • CH1T0787 (1).jpg
    CH1T0787 (1).jpg
    980.6 KB · Views: 148
  • CH1T0687 (1).jpg
    CH1T0687 (1).jpg
    816.8 KB · Views: 189
  • CH1T0706 - Version 2.jpg
    CH1T0706 - Version 2.jpg
    640.6 KB · Views: 190
Upvote 0