Re: *UPDATED* 5D Mark III Issue with EF 200 f/2L IS
No problem with the 100L. That's the only IS lens I got.
No problem with the 100L. That's the only IS lens I got.
Upvote
0
Jamesy said:Yikes - I have this lens and the 5D3 - I will try it later when I get home. I have tried a couple of shots with it but not in AI Servo mode.epiieq1 said:I experienced this today in AI Servo mode with my 70-200 f4L IS.
bchernicoff said:So, I tested my lens again and what I was hearing had nothing to do with the focus limiter setting. I am hearing the image stabilizer when it's active, but the sounds is being conducted through the body. I never noticed it on the Mk II, so I slapped it on my EOS film body and I can hear it there too. It sounds like an old floppy-disk drive when it was seeking. I'm wonder if the Mk III body conducts sound differently or if I just missed it on the Mk II though I find that kind of hard to believe.
Anyway, none of this is affecting performance in any way.
I can't speak to the algorithm but keep in mind that this issue is only happening at with AI Servo where there is constant or near constant communication between the body and the lens. When you press the shutter (or AF-ON) on a body it sends the signal to start IS and obtain focus, in my experience it shuts off in five or six seconds with no shutter release or if your finger is removed from the shutter. With AI Servo that is constant so that communication way different, it verges on chatter so any tweak to the algorithm could make a particular lens design totally wonky.marekjoz said:Does anybody has any idea why these strange sound appear? Is there any new algorithm of IS drive implemented? I thought lenses have their own processors taking care for optimal IS operating. If camera itself has such an influence on IS operation then it can occur, that IS effectiveness depends on what camera lenses are mounted on. That's something new for me.
Craig reported on FM the following:Maxis Gamez said:Last night I tested the camera again with my 800mm and other lenses including the 70-200mm f/4. I didn't notice any difference with the IS.
I must have a body without the issue. ;D
vuilang said:Anyone have a good estimate when this problem will be fixed?

Mt Spokane Photography said:vuilang said:Anyone have a good estimate when this problem will be fixed?
It will be fixed long before I can afford that lens. The body contains info about each EOS lens, and may have to set some internal adjustment different for that lens. Third party lenses tell the body that they are a certain Canon lens, which usually works fine until Canon updates the firmware to fix a problem.
There will probably be a general roll up of minor or even major fixes in two months. That seems to be the fastest that canon can do to develop and test fixes.
I doubt that any third party lens is telling the camera its a 200mm f/2 though.
Maxis Gamez said:I've used it with my 70-200mm f/4 IS L lens single and attached with my 1.4x III without the problem mentioned. I've also used it with my Canon 800mm L f/5.6 IS L lens and I haven't experience anything out of the ordinary.
Good luck to those with issues.