Failure to address the frame rate in electronic shutter! ACK!!
Items 4 and 5 are nice.
Items 4 and 5 are nice.
Upvote
0
I don't know - adding another modes might be nice, but I still have gripes, with how messy all those modes are.
- The old school servo tracking is exactly that - well, old school. Working against the logic of other modes. I don't want my camera to refocus when I move it, I want it to lock on the subject and track it. So in single point mode, no servo for me.
- Face tracking mode - default setting is useless for most users - no initial point displayed? So you are basically waiting for a camera to choose something from the scene to jump onto? This is a joke. So for face tracking mode, the servo mode feels better, at least to both me and my wife.
So, from focus and recompose, we've got ourselves to focus, track and recompose.
I thought it is a good feature. Why don't you appreciate it? Thx.I never needed such a dinosaur of then gone DSLR area while using modern mirrorless cameras.
In my life a focus point does not represent anything needed for perfect exposure, nothing!
I was hoping for a lower FPS option when using the electronic shutter - maybe next time?
Because dslr's went out with churning butter, horse drawn carriages and proper sentence structure.I never needed such a dinosaur of then gone DSLR area while using modern mirrorless cameras.
In my life a focus point does not represent anything needed for perfect exposure, nothing!
Add to that better/more options for button customisation.Please Canon give me more flexibility. I want to be able to map all controllers in Fv mode (don’t need the rear one to select parameters when there are four wheels on the camera).
Let me also chose drive modes or silent shooting with one button. I don’t know why these are not allowed.
Can’t you custom set that now?Add to that better/more options for button customisation.
That big depth of filed preview button that I've never used is crying out to be used as a REC button in video mode.
Metering locked to a focus point isn't of much interest to me for the way I shoot - full manual (Fv) adjusting the exposure from what I see through the evf. When I am doing a bird in flight against a background I don't want the exposure changing during a burst, and I want in general when its flying or perched without the highlights bleached or the body too dark when backlit. With my DSLR, I used to have the mode dial set up for different levels of over- or under-exposure and I'd switch between them. The WYSIWYG exposure through an evf is a real plus for me as I have realtime control, and I use it for all my shooting and not just birds.I thought it is a good feature. Why don't you appreciate it? Thx.
Loved to be told different or better told how but I’ve not found a setting for REC.Can’t you custom set that now?
Evaluative metering (at least on a DSLR) usually gives you this with a BIF against the sky:I never needed such a dinosaur of then gone DSLR area while using modern mirrorless cameras.
In my life a focus point does not represent anything needed for perfect exposure, nothing!
Maybe not, methinks…I was hoping for a lower FPS option when using the electronic shutter - maybe next time?
With my R5, for BIF shots against a blue sky, I find that partial (manual) metering from the sky, and about plus half a stop of compensation usually does the trick.Evaluative metering (at least on a DSLR) usually gives you this with a BIF against the sky:
View attachment 201231
Haven't shot that use case on my EOS R, do MILCs expose for the bird in that scenario, or do you rely on several stops of shadow lifting?