Those sound lovely (and I owned the EF-S 17-55/2.8, it was the first DSLR lens I bought), but I wouldn’t hold your breath waiting for any them. I highly doubt there will ever be an RF-S L lens.I would wish something like the following for my nice R7 (APS-C).
an follower for:
RF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS (the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM was quite popular) or
an equivalent for:
EF 17-40mm f/4L USM
I would like most if it would be an RF-S 17-40mm f/4 L
or better RF-S 17-40mm f/2.8 L
Cheaper , lighter.Just curious what advantage that would have over the 24 f/1.8?
Canon has several "lines" of RF lenses:Just curious what advantage that would have over the 24 f/1.8?
The majority of Canon’s customers buy a low-end body with the kit lens(es). The slow, variable aperture zooms fit that market by being inexpensive.I honestly can’t see me progressing with canon. They seem to enjoy leaving their consumers frustrated.
A 24-50 6.3!!! WTF
Just pointless, likewise 24-105 7.1!!
Complete waste of time and money.