Anyone know? I'd hate to be foreced onto the Adobe Cloud subscription service for buying a 6D2. And I am not prepared to use a work-around.
ScottyP said:Anyone know? I'd hate to be foreced onto the Adobe Cloud subscription service for buying a 6D2. And I am not prepared to use a work-around.
daphins said:It's my understanding that Adobe updates the RAW reader for LR6 through patches.
daphins said:I'll never pay adobe's extortion fee.
Keith_Reeder said:daphins said:I'll never pay adobe's extortion fee.
The price of a couple of coffees a month...
james75 said:So are you saying that if I bought a 6dii, and started using lightroom 6, it wouldn't recognize the camera files? And there's no guarantees that there would be an update for it unless you go subscripotion? Well that would suck.
james75 said:So are you saying that if I bought a 6dii, and started using lightroom 6, it wouldn't recognize the camera files? And there's no guarantees that there would be an update for it unless you go subscripotion? Well that would suck.
Khalai said:I hate the idea of monthly SW subsciption.
I don't see Adobe releasing major upgrades anymore
They just milk ther subsciptors while making bloated bugged software with snail-like upgrade cycle.
When Lightroom can't run smoothly on [email protected] with 32 GB RAM, GTX 1070 and NVMe SSD, something is simply not right...
ScottyP said:I just don't use PS or any of the other things on the "cloud" anyway; only Lightroom.
ScottyP said:What I don't think is going to happen is many brand new photographers picking up Lightroom, the entry level gateway to the Adobe universe, if it has to be in the form of an Adobe Cloud license, committing to that obligation forever and ever.
Keith_Reeder said:ScottyP said:I just don't use PS or any of the other things on the "cloud" anyway; only Lightroom.
Nothing here - not even Lr - is on the cloud.
Keith_Reeder said:ScottyP said:What I don't think is going to happen is many brand new photographers picking up Lightroom, the entry level gateway to the Adobe universe, if it has to be in the form of an Adobe Cloud license, committing to that obligation forever and ever.
And yet Adobe has just this month has reported its best quarterly results ever (part of an ongoing upward trend), attributed significantly to CC.
Far more people are OK with the subscription model than are against it.
Myself included.
Keith_Reeder said:And yet you'll happily pay a "subscription" for your electricity, gas, water, phone service, internet provision, online image back-up, rent...
Keith_Reeder said:And yet you'll happily pay a "subscription" for your electricity, gas, water, phone service, internet provision, online image back-up, rent...
It's an utterly illogical position.
Khalai said:I see that quite differently.
Keith_Reeder said:Khalai said:I see that quite differently.
Yep, I'm sure you do.
But it really isn't meaningfully different in any significant way.
In all cases, you've only got the "service" you're paying for while you continue paying for it.
Exactly the same as Creative Cloud.
It might feel different, because with the old Adobe model, you still have a piece of software that works if you don't upgrade; but that's only true until you buy a camera that isn't supported by it.
So - in fact - even in the old "pay once every couple of years" model, you were still locked in to regular payments to Adobe if you wanted to stay current and up to date.